Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 25753: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 15:02 +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 05/04/14 02:41, xen.org wrote:
> > flight 25753 linux-linus real [real]
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25753/
> > 
> > Regressions :-(
> > 
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> >  test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd  5 xen-boot                  fail REGR. vs. 
> > 12557
> >  test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd  5 xen-boot            fail REGR. vs. 
> > 12557
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu  5 xen-boot                  fail REGR. vs. 
> > 12557
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl            5 xen-boot                  fail REGR. vs. 
> > 12557
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2    5 xen-boot                  fail REGR. vs. 
> > 12557
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1  5 xen-boot            fail REGR. vs. 
> > 12557
> >  test-amd64-i386-pair          8 xen-boot/dst_host         fail REGR. vs. 
> > 12557
> >  test-amd64-i386-pair          7 xen-boot/src_host         fail REGR. vs. 
> > 12557
> 
> Linux is currently broken for 32-bit x86 PV guests due to some changes
> to the kernel/irq stacks.  I think Boris is investigating.
> 
> I don't know if this explains these failures.  It's not obvious what the
> test name translates to.

It's test-$XENARCH-$DOM0ARCH-$SOMETHING. So all the failures are 32on64
x86, which fits the hypothesis.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel