Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.10 test] 25944: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.10 test] 25944: regressions - 
FAIL"):
> On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 06:14 +0100, xen.org wrote:
> > flight 25944 linux-3.10 real [real]
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25944/
> > 
> > Regressions :-(
> > 
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> >  build-armhf                   4 xen-build        fail in 25875 REGR. vs. 
> > 25793
> >  build-armhf-pvops             4 kernel-build     fail in 25875 REGR. vs. 
> > 25793
> 
> These have passed in the last dozen runs on this branch, yet osstest
> seems to still be considering the failure in 25875 (which was an
> infrastructure failure related to a power cut) as a proper failure.

osstest is looking at 25875 to find an excuse for this:

> > Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
> >  test-amd64-i386-pair     17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail pass in 
> > 25875

In this test, the migration times out between 15% and 20% of the
memory copy.

Looking at the log capture attempt (18.ts-logs-capture.log), gall-mite
seems to be only intermittently functional.  Most of the log capture
commands time out, but some of them (near 02:03:05 and 02:08:05)
succeed.

None of this is associated with anything in the serial logs.  We don't
have the kernel log.  The dom0 kernel does seem to respond to at least
one of the debug keys, in a similar way to itch-mite's kernel.

Not sure where to go next.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel