Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 25966: regressions - FAIL

[Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 04/24/2014 10:37 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 24.04.14 at 16:00, <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > flight 25966 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25966/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> >   build-i386                    4 xen-build                 fail REGR. vs. 25954
> Was a 32-bit build perhaps not tried before submitting that recent
> series?
>
> vtpm_cmd_handler.c:454:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned 
> type [-Werror=overflow]
For some reason I thought that mini-os domains required being built
as 64-bit.  Now that I think about this, it is obviously not true as
pv-grub is already 32-bit capable.  A fix for the compilation error
is posted and is compile tested; I will make sure the runtime works
later, although I don't see any obvious reasons for it to fail.

--
Daniel De Graaf
National Security Agency

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel