[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] util: Allow port allocator to skip bind() check
Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Test suites using the port allocator don't want to have different > behaviour depending on whether a port is in use on the host. Add > a VIR_PORT_ALLOCATOR_SKIP_BIND_CHECK which test suites can use > to skip the bind() test. The port allocator will thus only track > ports in use by the test suite process itself. This is fine when > using the port allocator to generate guest configs which won't > actually be launched > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/libxl/libxl_driver.c | 3 ++- > src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 9 ++++++--- > src/util/virportallocator.c | 14 ++++++++++---- > src/util/virportallocator.h | 7 ++++++- > tests/virportallocatortest.c | 4 ++-- > 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c b/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c > index 515d5c9..70f9bb8 100644 > --- a/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c > +++ b/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c > @@ -298,7 +298,8 @@ libxlStateInitialize(bool privileged, > if (!(libxl_driver->reservedVNCPorts = > virPortAllocatorNew(_("VNC"), > LIBXL_VNC_PORT_MIN, > - LIBXL_VNC_PORT_MAX))) > + LIBXL_VNC_PORT_MAX, > + 0))) > goto error; > > if (!(libxl_driver->domains = virDomainObjListNew())) > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c > index 3a7622a..b3a9036 100644 > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c > @@ -680,19 +680,22 @@ qemuStateInitialize(bool privileged, > if ((qemu_driver->remotePorts = > virPortAllocatorNew(_("display"), > cfg->remotePortMin, > - cfg->remotePortMax)) == NULL) > + cfg->remotePortMax, > + 0)) == NULL) > goto error; > > if ((qemu_driver->webSocketPorts = > virPortAllocatorNew(_("webSocket"), > cfg->webSocketPortMin, > - cfg->webSocketPortMax)) == NULL) > + cfg->webSocketPortMax, > + 0)) == NULL) > goto error; > > if ((qemu_driver->migrationPorts = > virPortAllocatorNew(_("migration"), > cfg->migrationPortMin, > - cfg->migrationPortMax)) == NULL) > + cfg->migrationPortMax, > + 0)) == NULL) > goto error; > > if (qemuSecurityInit(qemu_driver) < 0) > diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.c b/src/util/virportallocator.c > index b68133a..fa17475 100644 > --- a/src/util/virportallocator.c > +++ b/src/util/virportallocator.c > @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ struct _virPortAllocator { > > unsigned short start; > unsigned short end; > + > + unsigned int flags; > }; > > static virClassPtr virPortAllocatorClass; > @@ -71,7 +73,8 @@ VIR_ONCE_GLOBAL_INIT(virPortAllocator) > > virPortAllocatorPtr virPortAllocatorNew(const char *name, > unsigned short start, > - unsigned short end) > + unsigned short end, > + unsigned int flags) > { > virPortAllocatorPtr pa; > > @@ -87,6 +90,7 @@ virPortAllocatorPtr virPortAllocatorNew(const char *name, > if (!(pa = virObjectLockableNew(virPortAllocatorClass))) > return NULL; > > + pa->flags = flags; > pa->start = start; > pa->end = end; > > @@ -193,9 +197,11 @@ int virPortAllocatorAcquire(virPortAllocatorPtr pa, > if (used) > continue; > > - if (virPortAllocatorBindToPort(&v6used, i, AF_INET6) < 0 || > - virPortAllocatorBindToPort(&used, i, AF_INET) < 0) > - goto cleanup; > + if (!(pa->flags & VIR_PORT_ALLOCATOR_SKIP_BIND_CHECK)) { > + if (virPortAllocatorBindToPort(&v6used, i, AF_INET6) < 0 || > + virPortAllocatorBindToPort(&used, i, AF_INET) < 0) > + goto cleanup; > + } > > if (!used && !v6used) { > /* Add port to bitmap of reserved ports */ > diff --git a/src/util/virportallocator.h b/src/util/virportallocator.h > index c8aa6de..2fdb8d9 100644 > --- a/src/util/virportallocator.h > +++ b/src/util/virportallocator.h > @@ -28,9 +28,14 @@ > typedef struct _virPortAllocator virPortAllocator; > typedef virPortAllocator *virPortAllocatorPtr; > > +typedef enum { > + VIR_PORT_ALLOCATOR_SKIP_BIND_CHECK = (1 << 0), > +} virPortAllocatorFlags; > + > virPortAllocatorPtr virPortAllocatorNew(const char *name, > unsigned short start, > - unsigned short end); > + unsigned short end, > + unsigned int flags); > > int virPortAllocatorAcquire(virPortAllocatorPtr pa, > unsigned short *port); > diff --git a/tests/virportallocatortest.c b/tests/virportallocatortest.c > index 48d2c9a..96d2ade 100644 > --- a/tests/virportallocatortest.c > +++ b/tests/virportallocatortest.c > @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ VIR_LOG_INIT("tests.portallocatortest"); > > static int testAllocAll(const void *args ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) > { > - virPortAllocatorPtr alloc = virPortAllocatorNew("test", 5900, 5909); > + virPortAllocatorPtr alloc = virPortAllocatorNew("test", 5900, 5909, 0); > Should these tests be changed to use the new VIR_PORT_ALLOCATOR_SKIP_BIND_CHECK flag? Regards, Jim > int ret = -1; > unsigned short p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7; > > @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int testAllocAll(const void *args ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) > > static int testAllocReuse(const void *args ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) > { > - virPortAllocatorPtr alloc = virPortAllocatorNew("test", 5900, 5910); > + virPortAllocatorPtr alloc = virPortAllocatorNew("test", 5900, 5910, 0); > int ret = -1; > unsigned short p1, p2, p3, p4; > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |