Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH: Lazy Restore] xl restore: Add a new "-l" lazy switch.

[Dushyant Behl <myselfdushyantbehl@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry, my bad. I didn't notice that was libxc. Will change it accordingly and
try to follow it closely the next time. Thank you for being patient this time.

On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 18:32 +0530, Dushyant Behl wrote:
>> The statement which you have mentioned in the mail was actually mentioned
>> in the file xen/CODING_STYLE.
>
> No, its CODING_STYLE not xen/CODING_STYLE and this is the one which
> applies to tools/libxc (it even says so in the file).
>
>> I was actually following the file tools/libxl/CODING_STYLE.
>
> This is the wrong one to be following for libxc code, which
> xc_domain_restore certainly is.
>
> Ian.
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel