Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.2-testing test] 26936: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 04.06.14 at 15:17, <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> flight 26936 xen-4.2-testing real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/26936/ 
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  build-amd64-rumpuserxen       3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. vs. 
> 26490
>  test-i386-i386-libvirt        5 xen-boot                  fail REGR. vs. 
> 26490
>  test-i386-i386-xl             5 xen-boot                  fail REGR. vs. 
> 26490
>  test-i386-i386-pv             5 xen-boot                  fail REGR. vs. 
> 26490
>  test-amd64-amd64-pair        3 host-install/src_host(3) broken REGR. vs. 
> 26490
>  test-amd64-amd64-pair        4 host-install/dst_host(4) broken REGR. vs. 
> 26490
>  test-i386-i386-pair           7 xen-boot/src_host         fail REGR. vs. 
> 26490
>  test-i386-i386-pair           8 xen-boot/dst_host         fail REGR. vs. 
> 26490
>  test-i386-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3  5 xen-boot              fail REGR. vs. 
> 26490
>  test-i386-i386-xl-winxpsp3    5 xen-boot                  fail REGR. vs. 
> 26490
>  test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3  5 xen-boot              fail REGR. vs. 
> 26490

I reverted the change causing all the i386-only failures above; once
again I forgot to add respective 32-bit code in a backport.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel