[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] tools/libxc: Use an explicit check for PV MSRs in xc_domain_save()
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 18:26 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Migrating PV domains using MSRs is not supported. This uses the new > XEN_DOMCTL_get_vcpu_msrs and will fail the migration with an explicit error. > > This is an improvement upon the current failure of > "No extended context for VCPUxx (ENOBUFS)" > > Support for migrating PV domains which are using MSRs will be included in the > migration v2 work. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> > CC: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/libxc/xc_domain_save.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_domain_save.c b/tools/libxc/xc_domain_save.c > index acf3685..7ef5183 100644 > --- a/tools/libxc/xc_domain_save.c > +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_domain_save.c > @@ -1995,6 +1995,44 @@ int xc_domain_save(xc_interface *xch, int io_fd, > uint32_t dom, uint32_t max_iter > goto out; > } > > + /* Check there are no PV MSRs in use. */ > + domctl.cmd = XEN_DOMCTL_get_vcpu_msrs; > + domctl.domain = dom; > + memset(&domctl.u, 0, sizeof(domctl.u)); > + domctl.u.vcpu_msrs.vcpu = i; > + if ( xc_domctl(xch, &domctl) < 0 ) > + { > + PERROR("Error querying maximum number of MSRs for VCPU%d", i); > + goto out; > + } > + > + if ( domctl.u.vcpu_msrs.msr_count ) > + { > + buffer = xc_hypercall_buffer_alloc(xch, buffer, > + domctl.u.vcpu_msrs.msr_count * > + > sizeof(xen_domctl_vcpu_msr_t)); > + if ( !buffer ) > + { > + PERROR("Insufficient memory for getting MSRs for VCPU%d", i); > + goto out; > + } > + set_xen_guest_handle(domctl.u.vcpu_msrs.msrs, buffer); > + > + if ( xc_domctl(xch, &domctl) < 0 ) > + { > + PERROR("Error querying MSRs for VCPU%d", i); > + goto out; > + } > + > + xc_hypercall_buffer_free(xch, buffer); > + if ( domctl.u.vcpu_msrs.msr_count ) I'm obviously missing something. You first call it with a NULL buffer to get domctl.u.vcpu_msrs.msr_count. Then if msr_count is non-zero you allocate a buffer and ask Xen to fill it. If it turns out that Xen did actually fill the buffer with something then you consider that an error. Can you not just error out on the basis of the initial msr_count? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |