Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 1/2] libxl: give pciback a chance to do its teardown before we reset the device.

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 18:56 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] libxl: give pciback a 
> chance to do its teardown before we reset the device."):
> > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:58:42AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > I think we would obviously prefer the former, meaning there should be a
> > > call to libxl__wait_for_backend("6") in here somewhere I think.
> > 
> > Yeah, that would be smarter.
> 
> No new callers of libxl__wait_for_backend should be introduced.  It's
> a synchronous sleeper.

What's the proper mechanism then?



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel