Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 1/4] xen/arm: observe itargets setting in vgic_enable_irqs and vgic_disable_irqs

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Stefano,

On 06/06/14 18:48, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>       return 0;
>   }
>
> @@ -369,6 +377,22 @@ read_as_zero:
>       return 1;
>   }
>
> +struct vcpu *vgic_get_target_vcpu(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int irq)
> +{
> +    int target;
> +    struct vgic_irq_rank *rank;
> +    struct vcpu *v_target;
> +
> +    rank = vgic_irq_rank(v, 1, irq/32);
> +    vgic_lock_rank(v, rank);
> +    target = byte_read(rank->itargets[(irq%32)/4], 0, irq % 4);
> +    /* just return the first vcpu in the mask */
> +    target = find_next_bit((const unsigned long *) &target, 8, 0);
int* and unsigned long* doesn't have the same alignment on aarch64. This 
may end up to a data abort for Xen side.
IIRC, Ian has fixed a similar issue in commit 5224a733.

[..]

>           }
>           if ( p->desc != NULL )
>           {
> @@ -502,6 +530,7 @@ static int vgic_distr_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, 
> mmio_info_t *info)
>       int offset = (int)(info->gpa - v->domain->arch.vgic.dbase);
>       int gicd_reg = REG(offset);
>       uint32_t tr;
> +    int i;
>
>       switch ( gicd_reg )
>       {
> @@ -585,6 +614,21 @@ static int vgic_distr_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, 
> mmio_info_t *info)
>           rank = vgic_irq_rank(v, 8, gicd_reg - GICD_ITARGETSR);
>           if ( rank == NULL) goto write_ignore;
>           vgic_lock_rank(v, rank);
> +        tr = *r & ~(rank->itargets[REG_RANK_INDEX(8, gicd_reg - 
> GICD_ITARGETSR)]);
Write in GICD_ITARGETSR can be either half-word or word. If I'm not 
mistaken you sanity check only handle word access.
Regards,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel