[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [systemd-devel] [PATCH v5 12/14] autoconf: xen: enable explicit preference option for xenstored preference



On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 07:52:56PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcgrof@xxxxxxxx) wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'm cc'ing a few security folks as I'd appreciate review on the ideas 
> >> > here,
> >> > in particular that of a launcher idea on system to replace alternatives 
> >> > on the
> >> > ExecStart= line of a systemd service unit file, alternative ideas are of
> >> > course welcomed. I'm also Cc'ing systemd-devel as this subject was 
> >> > reviewed
> >> > a little while ago with nothing concrete being recommended but instead a 
> >> > few
> >> > options being now archived as possibilities. I'm looking for a bit wider
> >> > review of the approaches and recomendations.
> >> >
> >> > Some general background for non xen folks: old xen requires the launch of
> >> > a daemon which implements supports of the xenstore, which is the database
> >> > that xen uses for information about guests / dom0. There are two 
> >> > supported
> >> > daemons, xenstored (C version) and oxenstored (Ocaml version) but they 
> >> > do the
> >> > same thing. Right now old init lets you override which one you pick 
> >> > through
> >> > an environment variable on /etc/{sysconfig,default}/xencommons, the 
> >> > script
> >> > will use the appropriate on there. Systemd doesn't let you use variables 
> >> > on
> >> > the ExecStart line of a service unit file so alternatives are required.
> >> >
> >> > The reason I'm being very careful here this could set a precedent and at
> >> > least for the launcher idea it'd require the usage of getenv() and 
> >> > execve(),
> >> > and secure alternatives for these (secure_getenv(), execve_nosecurity())
> >> > have either been merged or suggested before for Linux. The systemd 
> >> > discussion
> >> > is only specific to Linux but if we have a launcher we could consider it 
> >> > for
> >> > other supported OSes. All that said I'd like proper review of the 
> >> > security
> >> > implications of *all* strategies but obviously in particular the launcher
> >> > idea. I want to tread carefuly before setting precedents.
> >>
> >> You can also just invoke a shell script from ExecStart=. I mean, we try
> >> to deemphesize them in the boot process, but there's nothing wrong with
> >> using shell, if you need to parse shell configuraiton fragments and just
> >> want to execute on ot another program...
> >
> > I tried this and it didn't work given that systemd expects sd_notify()
> > to be called from the parent process, in this case the shell script.
> 
> Just use exec before the daemon command. I am pretty certain it can be
> just like this:
> 
>     ExecStart=/bin/sh -c "exec $XENSTORED"
> 
> xenstored then has the same PID as the sh process, and $NOTIFY_SOCKET
> works just fine.

Actually this does work on a test unit I just built. I'll proceed with
this approach since I haven't heard back from others and I think
this is the best approach now.

  Luis

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.