[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [systemd-devel] [PATCH v5 12/14] autoconf: xen: enable explicit preference option for xenstored preference
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 07:52:56PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote: > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:15:47AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> On Fri, 30.05.14 01:29, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcgrof@xxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> > >> > I'm cc'ing a few security folks as I'd appreciate review on the ideas > >> > here, > >> > in particular that of a launcher idea on system to replace alternatives > >> > on the > >> > ExecStart= line of a systemd service unit file, alternative ideas are of > >> > course welcomed. I'm also Cc'ing systemd-devel as this subject was > >> > reviewed > >> > a little while ago with nothing concrete being recommended but instead a > >> > few > >> > options being now archived as possibilities. I'm looking for a bit wider > >> > review of the approaches and recomendations. > >> > > >> > Some general background for non xen folks: old xen requires the launch of > >> > a daemon which implements supports of the xenstore, which is the database > >> > that xen uses for information about guests / dom0. There are two > >> > supported > >> > daemons, xenstored (C version) and oxenstored (Ocaml version) but they > >> > do the > >> > same thing. Right now old init lets you override which one you pick > >> > through > >> > an environment variable on /etc/{sysconfig,default}/xencommons, the > >> > script > >> > will use the appropriate on there. Systemd doesn't let you use variables > >> > on > >> > the ExecStart line of a service unit file so alternatives are required. > >> > > >> > The reason I'm being very careful here this could set a precedent and at > >> > least for the launcher idea it'd require the usage of getenv() and > >> > execve(), > >> > and secure alternatives for these (secure_getenv(), execve_nosecurity()) > >> > have either been merged or suggested before for Linux. The systemd > >> > discussion > >> > is only specific to Linux but if we have a launcher we could consider it > >> > for > >> > other supported OSes. All that said I'd like proper review of the > >> > security > >> > implications of *all* strategies but obviously in particular the launcher > >> > idea. I want to tread carefuly before setting precedents. > >> > >> You can also just invoke a shell script from ExecStart=. I mean, we try > >> to deemphesize them in the boot process, but there's nothing wrong with > >> using shell, if you need to parse shell configuraiton fragments and just > >> want to execute on ot another program... > > > > I tried this and it didn't work given that systemd expects sd_notify() > > to be called from the parent process, in this case the shell script. > > Just use exec before the daemon command. I am pretty certain it can be > just like this: > > ExecStart=/bin/sh -c "exec $XENSTORED" > > xenstored then has the same PID as the sh process, and $NOTIFY_SOCKET > works just fine. Actually this does work on a test unit I just built. I'll proceed with this approach since I haven't heard back from others and I think this is the best approach now. Luis _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |