[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 2/7] efi: Introduce EFI_NO_DIRECT flag
- To: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:52:33 +0100
- Cc: mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jeremy@xxxxxxxx, matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx, ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx, jbeulich@xxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, eshelton@xxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:52:43 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 13/06/14 18:00, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Introduce EFI_NO_DIRECT flag.
EFI_PARAVIRT would be a clearer name I think.
> +#define EFI_NO_DIRECT 6 /* Can we access EFI directly?
> */
#define EFI_PARAVIRT 6 /* Access is via a paravirt interface */
David
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
