[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 4/5] xen/arm: physical irq follow virtual irq
Hi Stefano, On 06/23/2014 05:37 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > -static void gic_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, const cpumask_t > *mask) > +static void gic_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, const cpumask_t > *cpu_mask) > { > - BUG(); > + volatile unsigned char *bytereg; > + unsigned int mask; > + > + if ( desc == NULL || cpumask_empty(cpu_mask) ) > + return; I think this check is pointless. Every irq_callback relies on the desc is not NULL. Hence, you already check it in irq_set_affinity. For the cpu_mask, we are in trouble is someone is calling with an empty mask. I would replace it by an ASSERT. The check here is pointless here. Every irq_callback rely on the desc is not NULL. Why this > /* XXX different for level vs edge */ > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > index b2f922c..5a504ad 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > @@ -438,6 +438,32 @@ static void vgic_migrate_irq(struct vcpu *old, struct > vcpu *new, unsigned int ir > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&old->arch.vgic.lock, flags); > } > > +static inline void irq_set_affinity(struct irq_desc *desc, > + const cpumask_t *cpu_mask) > +{ > + if ( desc != NULL ) > + desc->handler->set_affinity(desc, cpu_mask); > +} This function belongs to the IRQ module. It might be useful for other part in the future. I would move this function in irq.c or in asm-arm/irq.h if you want to keep it as inline function. Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |