[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/9] xen: Optimize introspection access to guest state
- To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:23:23 +0300
- Cc: tim@xxxxxxx
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:22:35 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=bitdefender.com; b=ghhy82Xrmyk/8guVSCN9VhocvBlZJzsyNB32DZV1Qq5gpT2Fv+XzBRPrBTpDH72f5c7/Pu2UpJiox4DtYQjURq0Ilro+7E3vf4eoG54AEzelyNmNpuOJ1Ss0onf4FdoKASBBSnQxmA9oCJFCtZR16COrfAPXqJaAyKWBFfEQyLIp0EP0DV2fJgpjihQDc1xrYmT3nR0CXqgqVQn1fyTclj7ehaSCsSkSxsOJ36pAHJk+k+H32FJgtqPF4iITcZreU6cJw7uAwnw6mKJIgTG5+DjpESog62H16luHMPHVBtY3o3+C1RefG/PgThYyRTWg93Nioc9GHtY0eg42GC+jVg==; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-BitDefender-Scanner:X-BitDefender-Spam:X-BitDefender-SpamStamp:X-BitDefender-CF-Stamp;
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 07/10/2014 11:17 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Your proposed change would make the results of vmx_guest_x86_mode() part
> of the Xen ABI, and therefore hard to refactor in the future if the need
> were to arise.
>
> Also, it ties any SVM extension of your work to VT-x internals.
I see. Yes, that makes sense. I'll take guest_x86_mode out.
Thanks,
Razvan Cojocaru
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
