Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: Introduce 'xen_nopv' to disable PV extensions for HVM guests.

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 11, 2014 7:14 PM, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 07/11/2014 04:09 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: 
> > 
> > On Jul 11, 2014 6:52 PM, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> >> 
> >> On 07/11/2014 12:53 PM, konrad@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: 
> >>> 
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 
> >>> b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 
> >>> index c1b9aa8..5dcfa6e 100644 
> >>> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt 
> >>> @@ -3691,6 +3691,10 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also 
> >>> be entirely omitted. 
> >>>ÂÂ Disables the ticketlock slowpath using Xen PV 
> >>>ÂÂ optimizations. 
> >>>ÂÂ 
> >>> + xen_nopv [X86,XEN] 
> >>> + Disables the PV optimizations forcing the guest to run 
> >>> + as generic HVM guest with no PV drivers. 
> >>> + 
> >>>ÂÂ xirc2ps_cs= [NET,PCMCIA] 
> >>>ÂÂ Format: 
> >>>ÂÂ 
> >>><irq>,<irq_mask>,<io>,<full_duplex>,<do_sound>,<lockup_hack>[,<irq2>[,<irq3>[,<irq4>]]]
> >>> 
> >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c 
> >>> index ffb101e..eb82239 100644 
> >>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c 
> >>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c 
> >>> @@ -1826,8 +1826,19 @@ static void __init xen_hvm_guest_init(void) 
> >>>ÂÂ xen_hvm_init_mmu_ops(); 
> >>>ÂÂ } 
> >>>ÂÂ 
> >>> +static bool xen_nopv = false; 
> >>> +static __init int xen_parse_nopv(char *arg) 
> >>> +{ 
> >>> +ÂÂÂÂÂÂ xen_nopv = true; 
> >>> +ÂÂÂÂÂÂ return 0; 
> >>> +} 
> >>> +early_param("xen_nopv", xen_parse_nopv); 
> >>> + 
> >>>ÂÂ static uint32_t __init xen_hvm_platform(void) 
> >>>ÂÂ { 
> >>> + if (xen_nopv) 
> >>> + return 0; 
> >>> + 
> >>>ÂÂ if (xen_pv_domain()) 
> >>>ÂÂ return 0; 
> >>>ÂÂ 
> >>> @@ -1836,6 +1847,8 @@ static uint32_t __init xen_hvm_platform(void) 
> >>>ÂÂ 
> >>>ÂÂ bool xen_hvm_need_lapic(void) 
> >>>ÂÂ { 
> >>> + if (xen_nopv) 
> >>> + return false; 
> >>>ÂÂ if (xen_pv_domain()) 
> >>>ÂÂ return false; 
> >>>ÂÂ if (!xen_hvm_domain()) 
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> Any reason to not simply let xen_pv_domain() return false here? 
> > 
> > It does return false already. 
> > 
> > Did you mean to collapse them together? 
>
> OK, I'm confused. The description of the option makes it look like it 
> could disable things associated with PV domains, but it looks like it 
> actually disables things having to do with HVM domains... 
>

Thank you for pointing that out. I will update the documentation to be more 
clear and specific. It is as you surmised only for HVM guest.

The a
> -hpa 
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel