[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] mmap_vmcore: skip non-ram pages reported by hypervisors



Sorry for delayed responce...

(2014/07/11 17:49), Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> We have a special check in read_vmcore() handler to check if the page was
> reported as ram or not by the hypervisor (pfn_is_ram()). However, when
> vmcore is read with mmap() no such check is performed. That can lead to
> unpredictable results, e.g. when running Xen PVHVM guest memcpy() after
> mmap() on /proc/vmcore will hang processing HVMMEM_mmio_dm pages creating
> enormous load in both DomU and Dom0.
> 
> Fix the issue by mapping each non-ram page to the zero page. Keep direct
> path with remap_oldmem_pfn_range() to avoid looping through all pages on
> bare metal.
> 
> The issue can also be solved by overriding remap_oldmem_pfn_range() in
> xen-specific code, as remap_oldmem_pfn_range() was been designed for.
> That, however, would involve non-obvious xen code path for all x86 builds
> with CONFIG_XEN_PVHVM=y and would prevent all other hypervisor-specific
> code on x86 arch from doing the same override.
> 
> Changes from v3:
> - multi line comment style changes
> - minor code style changes
> 
> Changes from v2:
> - make remap_oldmem_pfn_checked() interface exactly match
>    remap_oldmem_pfn_range()
> - unmap mapped part inside remap_oldmem_pfn_checked() in case of failure so
>    we don't need to take care of it in mmap_vmcore()
> - create vmcore_remap_oldmem_pfn() wrapper
> 
> Changes from v1:
> - comment style changes
> - change remap_oldmem_pfn_checked() interface to closer match the
>    remap_oldmem_pfn() interface
> - preserve formal parameters within the loop, make the loop conditions
>    easier to understand
> - use my_zero_pfn() for the zero page
> - return remapped length instead of new offset
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   fs/proc/vmcore.c | 83 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
> index 382aa89..405a409 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
> @@ -328,6 +328,83 @@ static inline char *alloc_elfnotes_buf(size_t notes_sz)
>    * virtually contiguous user-space in ELF layout.
>    */
>   #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> +/*
> + * remap_oldmem_pfn_checked - do remap_oldmem_pfn_range replacing all pages
> + * reported as not being ram with the zero page.
> + *
> + * @vma: vm_area_struct describing requested mapping
> + * @from: start remapping from
> + * @pfn: page frame number to start remapping to
> + * @size: remapping size
> + * @prot: protection bits
> + *
> + * Returns zero on success, -EAGAIN on failure.
> + */
> +int remap_oldmem_pfn_checked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long from,
> +                          unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size,
> +                          pgprot_t prot)
> +{
> +     size_t map_size;

unsigned long is better? At least all the occurences of this variable in
this function is used as unsigned long.

> +     unsigned long pos_start, pos_end, pos;
> +     unsigned long zeropage_pfn = my_zero_pfn(0);
> +     u64 len = 0;
> +
> +     pos_start = pfn;
> +     pos_end = pfn + (size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +
> +     for (pos = pos_start; pos < pos_end; ++pos) {
> +             if (!pfn_is_ram(pos)) {
> +                     /*
> +                      * We hit a page which is not ram. Remap the continuous
> +                      * region between pos_start and pos-1 and replace
> +                      * the non-ram page at pos with the zero page.
> +                      */
> +                     if (pos > pos_start) {
> +                             /* Remap continuous region */
> +                             map_size = (pos - pos_start) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +                             if (remap_oldmem_pfn_range(vma, from + len,
> +                                                        pos_start, map_size,
> +                                                        prot))
> +                                     goto fail;
> +                             len += map_size;
> +                     }
> +                     /* Remap the zero page */
> +                     if (remap_oldmem_pfn_range(vma, from + len,
> +                                                zeropage_pfn,
> +                                                PAGE_SIZE, prot))
> +                             goto fail;
> +                     len += PAGE_SIZE;
> +                     pos_start = pos + 1;
> +             }
> +     }
> +     if (pos > pos_start) {
> +             /* Remap the rest */
> +             map_size = (pos - pos_start) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +             if (remap_oldmem_pfn_range(vma, from + len, pos_start,
> +                                        map_size, vma->vm_page_prot))

                                                  Is prot correct here?

> +                     goto fail;
> +             len += map_size;
> +     }
> +     return 0;
> +fail:
> +     do_munmap(vma->vm_mm, from, len);
> +     return -EAGAIN;
> +}
> +
> +int vmcore_remap_oldmem_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +                         unsigned long from, unsigned long pfn,
> +                         unsigned long size, pgprot_t prot)
> +{
> +     /*
> +      * Check if oldmem_pfn_is_ram was registered to avoid
> +      * looping over all pages without a reason.
> +      */
> +     if (oldmem_pfn_is_ram)
> +             return remap_oldmem_pfn_checked(vma, from, pfn, size, prot);
> +     else
> +             return remap_oldmem_pfn_range(vma, from, pfn, size, prot);
> +}
> +
>   static int mmap_vmcore(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>   {
>       size_t size = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
> @@ -387,9 +464,9 @@ static int mmap_vmcore(struct file *file, struct 
> vm_area_struct *vma)
>   
>                       tsz = min_t(size_t, m->offset + m->size - start, size);
>                       paddr = m->paddr + start - m->offset;
> -                     if (remap_oldmem_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start + len,
> -                                                paddr >> PAGE_SHIFT, tsz,
> -                                                vma->vm_page_prot))
> +                     if (vmcore_remap_oldmem_pfn(vma, vma->vm_start + len,
> +                                                 paddr >> PAGE_SHIFT, tsz,
> +                                                 vma->vm_page_prot))
>                               goto fail;
>                       size -= tsz;
>                       start += tsz;
> 

It looks to me good other than the above two comments.

Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.