Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] PCI back fixes for 3.17.

[Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Monday, July 14, 2014, 9:01:29 PM, you wrote:


> Monday, July 14, 2014, 8:45:47 PM, you wrote:

>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 08:24:33PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> 
>>> Monday, July 14, 2014, 7:45:25 PM, you wrote:
>>> 
>>> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 07:43:04PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> >> 
>>> >> Monday, July 14, 2014, 7:37:53 PM, you wrote:
>>> >> 
>>> >> >> >> Ad B)
>>> >> >> >> 
>>> >> >> >> root@dom0:~# xl pci-list router
>>> >> >> >> Vdev Device
>>> >> >> >> 05.0 0000:00:1b.0
>>> >> >> >> 
>>> >> >> >> root@dom0:~# xl pci-assignable-list
>>> >> >> >> 0000:02:00.0
>>> >> >> >> 
>>> >> >> >> root@dom0:~# xl pci-detach router 00:1b.0
>>> >> >> >> dmesg shows:
>>> >> >> >> [  199.742668] pciback 0000:00:1b.0: restoring config space at 
>>> >> >> >> offset 0x10 (was 0x4, writing 0xf7d30004)
>>> >> >> >> [  199.743527] pciback 0000:00:1b.0: restoring config space at 
>>> >> >> >> offset 0xc (was 0x0, writing 0x10)
>>> >> >> >> [  199.744321] pciback 0000:00:1b.0: restoring config space at 
>>> >> >> >> offset 0x4 (was 0x100000, writing 0x100006)
>>> >> >> >> [  199.757184] xen-pciback pci-1-0: xen_pcibk_xenbus_remove 
>>> >> >> >> freeing pdev @ 0xffff8800589fce40
>>> >> >> >> [  199.758139] xen-pciback pci-1-0: xen_pcibk_disconnect pdev @ 
>>> >> >> >> 0xffff8800589fce40
>>> >> >> >> [  199.862595] xen: xen_unregister_device_domain_owner
>>> >> >> >> 
>>> >> >> >> xl dmesg shows:
>>> >> >> >> (XEN) [2014-07-14 16:28:29] memory_map:remove: dom1 gfn=f3070 
>>> >> >> >> mfn=f7d30 nr=4
>>> >> >> >> (XEN) [2014-07-14 16:28:29] io.c:322: d1: unbind: m_gsi=22 
>>> >> >> >> g_gsi=36 dev=00:00.5 intx=0
>>> >> >> >> (XEN) [2014-07-14 16:28:29] io.c:390: d1 unmap: m_irq=22 
>>> >> >> >> dev=00:00.5 intx=0
>>> >> >> >> (XEN) [2014-07-14 16:28:29] [VT-D]iommu.c:1579: d1:PCIe: unmap 
>>> >> >> >> 0000:00:1b.0
>>> >> >> >> (XEN) [2014-07-14 16:28:29] [VT-D]iommu.c:1440: d0:PCIe: map 
>>> >> >> >> 0000:00:1b.0
>>> >> >> >> 
>>> >> >> >> root@dom0:~# xl pci-list router
>>> >> >> >> root@dom0:~# xl pci-assignable-list
>>> >> >> >> 0000:00:1b.0
>>> >> >> >> 0000:02:00.0
>>> >> >> >> 
>>> >> >> >> root@dom0:~# xl pci-assignable-remove 00:1b.0
>>> >> >> >> dmesg shows:
>>> >> >> >> [  318.827415] xen: xen_unregister_device_domain_owner
>>> >> >> >> [  318.828771] xen: xen_unregister_device_domain_owner: ENODEV
>>> >> >> >> [  318.930869] pciback 0000:00:1b.0: restoring config space at 
>>> >> >> >> offset 0x10 (was 0x4, writing 0xf7d30004)
>>> >> >> >> [  318.933435] pciback 0000:00:1b.0: restoring config space at 
>>> >> >> >> offset 0xc (was 0x0, writing 0x10)
>>> >> >> >> [  318.935877] pciback 0000:00:1b.0: restoring config space at 
>>> >> >> >> offset 0x4 (was 0x100000, writing 0x100006)
>>> >> >> >> 
>>> >> >> >> root@dom0:~# xl pci-list router
>>> >> >> >> root@dom0:~# xl pci-assignable-list
>>> >> >> >> 0000:02:00.0
>>> >> >> >> 
>>> >> >> >> 
>>> >> >> 
>>> >> >> > And if you do:
>>> >> >> 
>>> >> >> > # xl pci-detach router 02:00.0
>>> >> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> > Err, I meant
>>> >> > # xl pci-assignable-remove 02:00.0
>>> >> 
>>> >> Ah ok .. so that is:
>>> >> remove a device from pciback that has never been assigned to any guest 
>>> >> .. 
>>> >> 
>>> >> will also give that a go .. although that probably won't be a problem. 
>>> 
>>> > Right. So I think it all works as expected? That is if you have
>>> > two PCI devices assigned to a guest and want to re-use them you
>>> > have to do the 'pci-detach' twice and then follow that with
>>> >  'pci-assignable-remove' twice as well?
>>> 
>>> Well except that's not what i want :-) .. that's about the same as shutting 
>>> down 
>>> the guest .. and indeed that works :-)
>>> 
>>> What i want to do is to remove just *one* device and leave the other one in 
>>> the guest.
>>> 
>>> The one that i remove .. i would like to be able to remove it from being 
>>> assignable .. (rebind it in dom0) and/or assign it to another guest.

>> Aha
>>> 
>>> And that fails because pciback still thinks the guest owns the device ..
>>> while libxl thinks it doesn't (outcome of xl pci-assignable-list).

>> Oh
>>> 
>>> When doing the:
>>> 
>>> # xl pci-assignable-list
>>> 0000:02:00.0
>>> # xl pci-assignable-remove 02:00.0
>>> dmesg shows:               
>>> [  443.292951] xen: xen_unregister_device_domain_owner
>>> [  443.294308] xen: xen_unregister_device_domain_owner: ENODEV
>>> [  443.398827] pciback 0000:02:00.0: restoring config space at offset 0x3c 
>>> (was 0x100, writing 0x104)
>>> [  443.400797] pciback 0000:02:00.0: restoring config space at offset 0x10 
>>> (was 0x4, writing 0xf7c00004)
>>> [  443.401713] pciback 0000:02:00.0: restoring config space at offset 0x4 
>>> (was 0x100000, writing 0x100006)
>>> 
>>> which i think is what is expected ..

>> Right.

>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hmm  /sys/bus/pci/drivers/pciback  doesn't shed much light, because in the 
>>> state 
>>> just after a xl pci-detach, the device is still registred by pciback (from 
>>> dom0's 
>>> view) which is correct, what is wrong is that pciback still seems to think 
>>> that 
>>> it is in turn still owned by the guest. That doesn't get reflected in the 
>>> info 
>>> available in the /sys dir.

>> Oh
>>> 
>>> Ok over to xen-store ... 

>> I think I had a patch for that in libxl. It was the order of operations it 
>> was
>> doing - it did the 'unbind' first and then it did the XenBus operations.

>>> 
>>> first a diff between the booted guest with two devices passed through and 
>>> the 
>>> state after the "xl pci-detach router 00:1b.0"
>>> 
>>> root@creanuc:~# diff -U10 xs-before-detach-first.txt 
>>> xs-after-detach-first.txt
>>> --- xs-before-detach-first.txt  2014-07-14 19:56:23.233576000 +0200
>>> +++ xs-after-detach-first.txt   2014-07-14 20:00:00.053576000 +0200
>>> @@ -185,35 +185,29 @@
>>>         feature-rx-flip = "0"
>>>         feature-split-event-channels = "1"
>>>         multi-queue-max-queues = "4"
>>>         hotplug-status = "connected"
>>>      pci = ""
>>>       1 = ""
>>>        0 = ""
>>>         frontend = "/local/domain/1/device/pci/0"
>>>         frontend-id = "1"
>>>         online = "1"
>>> -       state = "3"
>>> +       state = "7"
>>>         domain = "router"
>>>         key-0 = "0000:02:00.0"
>>>         dev-0 = "0000:02:00.0"
>>>         vdevfn-0 = "28"
>>>         opts-0 = "msitranslate=0,power_mgmt=0,permissive=0"
>>>         state-0 = "3"
>>> -       key-1 = "0000:00:1b.0"
>>> -       dev-1 = "0000:00:1b.0"
>>> -       vdevfn-1 = "30"
>>> -       opts-1 = "msitranslate=0,power_mgmt=0,permissive=0"
>>> -       state-1 = "3"
>>> -       num_devs = "2"
>>> +       num_devs = "1"
>>>         vdev-0 = "0000:00:00.00"
>>> -       vdev-1 = "0000:00:01.00"
>>>         root-0 = "0000:00"
>>>         root_num = "1"
>>>    1 = ""
>>>     vm = "/vm/a102d97e-8388-414e-97e5-cc394656c47d"
>>>     name = "router"
>>>     cpu = ""
>>>      0 = ""
>>>       availability = "online"
>>>      1 = ""
>>>       availability = "online"
>>> 
>>> It seems ok, perhaps apart from the general pci state going from 3 to 7 ?
>>> Haven't looked up the exact states, but since only one domain is removes i 
>>> would 
>>> still expect it to be 3 ?

>> 7 is Reconfiguring which is what it should move to (to update the XenBus).

> Ok, but that should than be acknowledged somewhere by someone i suppose .. 
> and 
> not stay in that state ?

>>> 
>>> 
>>> Now a diff before and after the "xl pci-assignable-remove 00:1b.0"
>>> diff xs-after-detach-first.txt xs-after-pci-assignable-remove-first.txt is 
>>> empty, as expected since this is a pciback only thing now involving any 
>>> guest.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> And now the last diff, between the state before and after the "xl 
>>> pci-detach 
>>> 02:00.0" removing the last pci device from the guest.
>>> 
>>> root@creanuc:~# diff -U5 xs-after-pci-assignable-remove-first.txt 
>>> xs-after-pci-detach-second.txt
>>> --- xs-after-pci-assignable-remove-first.txt    2014-07-14 
>>> 20:00:45.161576000 +0200
>>> +++ xs-after-pci-detach-second.txt      2014-07-14 20:01:20.177576000 +0200
>>> @@ -184,27 +184,10 @@
>>>         feature-rx-copy = "1"
>>>         feature-rx-flip = "0"
>>>         feature-split-event-channels = "1"
>>>         multi-queue-max-queues = "4"
>>>         hotplug-status = "connected"
>>> -    pci = ""
>>> -     1 = ""
>>> -      0 = ""
>>> -       frontend = "/local/domain/1/device/pci/0"
>>> -       frontend-id = "1"
>>> -       online = "1"
>>> -       state = "7"
>>> -       domain = "router"
>>> -       key-0 = "0000:02:00.0"
>>> -       dev-0 = "0000:02:00.0"
>>> -       vdevfn-0 = "28"
>>> -       opts-0 = "msitranslate=0,power_mgmt=0,permissive=0"
>>> -       state-0 = "3"
>>> -       num_devs = "1"
>>> -       vdev-0 = "0000:00:00.00"
>>> -       root-0 = "0000:00"
>>> -       root_num = "1"
>>>    1 = ""
>>>     vm = "/vm/a102d97e-8388-414e-97e5-cc394656c47d"
>>>     name = "router"
>>>     cpu = ""
>>>      0 = ""
>>> @@ -249,15 +232,10 @@
>>>        event-channel-rx = "25"
>>>        request-rx-copy = "1"
>>>        feature-rx-notify = "1"
>>>        feature-sg = "1"
>>>        feature-gso-tcpv4 = "1"
>>> -    pci = ""
>>> -     0 = ""
>>> -      backend = "/local/domain/0/backend/pci/1/0"
>>> -      backend-id = "0"
>>> -      state = "1"
>>>     control = ""
>>>      shutdown = ""
>>>      platform-feature-multiprocessor-suspend = "1"
>>>      platform-feature-xs_reset_watches = "1"
>>>     hvmloader = ""
>>> 
>>> That seems ok.
>>> 
>>> So apart from that perhaps incorrect general pci state change, the info in 
>>> xenstore seems to be OK.
>>> 
>>> So it does seem to be a lack of pciback receiving a confirm from libxl / 
>>> qemu that the 
>>> device is indeed removed from the guest for the final deregistring of the 
>>> ownership.
>>> 
>>> Because after a pci-detach the pci device is:
>>> - removed from xen-store as attached to the guest
>>> - the iommu has assigned/mapped it back to dom0
>>> - xl pci-assignable-list shows it as assignable again
>>> 
>>> So only pciback is the only one left out of the party :-)
>>> Couldn't it be somehow tied to the iommu events, since it should be in sync 
>>> with that i suppose ?


>> Let me find out what is up with this. Once the device
>> is de-assigned from a guest (even if forcefully) it should
>> be possible to assign it to another.

> Yes .. at least for the rebinding to dom0 case, because the 
> pci-assignable-remove seems to do it forcefully now. But i haven't tried what 
> it 
> does when reassigning to another guest (if it forcefully swaps ownership 
> then, 
> since the pci-assignable-remove isn't involved then).

> Will give the xen patch a try.

The patch doesn't make a difference.

>>> 
>>> --
>>> Sander
>>> 
>>> BTW, i don't see the "do_flr" anywhere in /sys/*/pciback/ ?

>> We been having a lengthy discussion about this and David is out
>> on vacation so will have to wait until he is back.

>>> 





_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel