[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/1] xen:vtd: missing RMRR mapping while share EPT
>>> On 24.07.14 at 09:00, <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2014/7/24 14:14, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 24.07.14 at 03:23, <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> @@ -1867,7 +1869,21 @@ static int rmrr_identity_mapping(struct domain *d, >>> >>> while ( base_pfn < end_pfn ) >>> { >>> - if ( intel_iommu_map_page(d, base_pfn, base_pfn, >>> + if ( iommu_use_hap_pt(d) ) >> >> Don't you, btw, need to extend this condition by >> && (!iommu_passthrough || !is_hardware_domain(d))? > > Why do we need these checks here? At least for documentation purposes: It would be wrong to try to establish these mappings. I reckon iommu_use_hap_pt() implies the combined other condition, so an ASSERT() would presumably be fine as well (and get even closer to the intended documentation purpose). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |