Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] xen/console: Better handing of console_timestamps as a boolean_param

[Don Slutz <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 07/30/14 04:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 30.07.14 at 10:01, <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > On 29.07.14 at 21:57, <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > --- a/xen/drivers/char/console.c
> > > +++ b/xen/drivers/char/console.c
> > The patch could have been quite a bit smaller if you used "return"
> > instead of "break" in the two above cases.
> I.e.
>
> console: better handing of console_timestamps as a boolean_param
>
> In order to handle all the old ways, change to use parse_bool().
>
> Signed-off-by: Don Slutz <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Restructure code to limit churn.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
This is fine with me.
    -Don Slutz

> --- a/xen/drivers/char/console.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/char/console.c
> @@ -559,6 +559,15 @@ static int printk_prefix_check(char *p,
>   
>   static void __init parse_console_timestamps(char *s)
>   {
> +    switch ( parse_bool(s) )
> +    {
> +    case 0:
> +        opt_con_timestamp_mode = TSM_NONE;
> +        return;
> +    case 1:
> +        opt_con_timestamp_mode = TSM_DATE;
> +        return;
> +    }
>       if ( *s == '\0' || /* Compat for old booleanparam() */
>            !strcmp(s, "date") )
>           opt_con_timestamp_mode = TSM_DATE;

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel