|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH ARM v7 09/13] mini-os: arm: time
On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 16:47 +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote:
Sorry for how long I took to get to this, travel and the resulting
backlog conspired against me.
> + __asm__ __volatile__("isb;mrrc p15, 1, %0, %1, c14":"=r"(c_lo),
> "=r"(c_hi));
Is the isb really necessary here?
> + return (((uint64_t) c_hi) << 32) + c_lo;
> +}
> +
> +/* monotonic_clock(): returns # of nanoseconds passed since time_init()
> + * Note: This function is required to return accurate
> + * time even in the absence of multiple timer ticks.
> + */
> +uint64_t monotonic_clock(void)
> +{
> + s_time_t time = ticks_to_ns(read_virtual_count() - cntvct_at_init);
> + //printk("monotonic_clock: %llu (%llu)\n", time, NSEC_TO_SEC(time));
There's quite a few of these //printk(debug) statements in this patch...
> + return time;
> +}
> +
> +int gettimeofday(struct timeval *tv, void *tz)
> +{
> + uint64_t nsec = monotonic_clock();
> + nsec += shadow_ts.tv_nsec;
> +
> + tv->tv_sec = shadow_ts.tv_sec;
> + tv->tv_sec += NSEC_TO_SEC(nsec);
> + tv->tv_usec = NSEC_TO_USEC(nsec % 1000000000UL);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void set_vtimer_compare(uint64_t value) {
> + uint32_t x, y;
> +
> + DEBUG("New CompareValue : %llx\n", value);
> + x = 0xFFFFFFFFULL & value;
> + y = (value >> 32) & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> +
> + __asm__ __volatile__("mcrr p15, 3, %0, %1, c14"
> + ::"r"(x), "r"(y));
I think you can use
"mcrr p15, 3, %0, %H0, c14" :: "r" (value)
here.
> +
> + __asm__ __volatile__("mov %0, #0x1\n"
> + "mcr p15, 0, %0, c14, c3, 1\n" /* Enable timer and unmask the
> output signal */
> + "isb":"=r"(x));
x = 1 before this would avoid the mov inside the inline stuff as well as
the strange looking use of an output register for a write.
> +}
> +
> +void unset_vtimer_compare(void) {
> + uint32_t x;
> +
> + __asm__ __volatile__("mov %0, #0x2\n"
> + "mcr p15, 0, %0, c14, c3, 1\n" /* Disable timer and mask the
> output signal */
> + "isb":"=r"(x));
and again. You probably just want a write_timer_ctl(uiint.. val) type
function.
> +}
> +
> +void block_domain(s_time_t until)
> +{
> + uint64_t until_count = ns_to_ticks(until) + cntvct_at_init;
> + ASSERT(irqs_disabled());
> + if (read_virtual_count() < until_count)
> + {
> + set_vtimer_compare(until_count);
> + //char buf[] = "sleep\n";
> (void)HYPERVISOR_console_io(CONSOLEIO_write, strlen(buf), buf);
> + __asm__ __volatile__("wfi");
> + //char wake[] = "wake\n";
> (void)HYPERVISOR_console_io(CONSOLEIO_write, strlen(wake), wake);
More left over debug.
> + unset_vtimer_compare();
> +
> + /* Give the IRQ handler a chance to handle whatever woke us up. */
> + local_irq_enable();
> + local_irq_disable();
> + }
> +}
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |