Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen/arm: Correctly support WARN_ON

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/09/14 12:19, Julien Grall wrote:
> > OOI what is the size increase of the final (stripped) binary with this
> > patch?
> I compared the file xen/xen and on both arm32/arm64 the binary is
> smaller of about 2%.
>
> I think this is because previously gcc wasn't merge the string when
> BUG_ON was used in inline function.
BTW this series won't work correctly because of XSA-102 on ARM64 when 
WARN_ON/BUG_ON/ASSERT is used in startup code.
This is because the "current" is set to a debug sanity value.

Do you plan to send the series to add support for 32-bit userspace on 
64-bits kernels for Xen 4.5?
Regards,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel