[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] cpufreq implementation for OMAP under xen hypervisor.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:45:36PM +0300, Oleksandr Dmytryshyn wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > The architecture looks sane to me. As Konrad pointed out, the difficulty > > > > here is to be able to upstream the changes to the Linux driver in 2), > > > > that you later in the thread identified as > > > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c. > > > I'll write driver drivers/xen/xen-cpufreq.c and it replace original > > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > > > And in the original cpufreq-cpu0 driver I'll chande only one string - > > > path in the device tree > > > with the settings for the CPUs opp: > > > string > > > np = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus/cpu@0"); > > > will changed to: > > > np = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus/cpu@0/private_data/cpu@0"); > > > > > > > If the changes are not invasive and you manage to upstream them in > > > > Linux, I am all for this solution. > > > In Linux kernel I should make few changes: > > > 1. Enable CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE > > > with disabled CONFIG_CPU_FREQ > > > 2. Enable CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 > > > with disabled CONFIG_CPU_FREQ > > > > > > I mean make those configs dependent on > > > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ or CONFIX_XEN_DOM0 > > > instead of > > > CONFIG_CPU_FREQ > > > > Gosh no. Please make it work runtime. > Sorry, Konrad, could You please explain what did You mean. Don't make XEN options disable other options. Distributions want one kernel that can satisfi a variety of platforms - not just specifc ones. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |