[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 for 4.5] xen/arm: Add support for GICv3 for domU
- To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:43:09 +0000
- Cc: wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, vijay.kilari@xxxxxxxxx, tim@xxxxxxx, Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:43:38 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 10/11/2014 12:38, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 15:26 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > That is to guard against somebody building against libxc or libxl and
> > > > then becoming dependent on this and then complaining that it is not in
> > > > Xen 4.6.
> > >
> > > libxc does not have a stable API and libxl doesn't expose this interface
> > > at all. At the hypercall level this is a domctl which simliarly has no
> > > stable interface.
> > >
> > > So I don't think there is any need to wrap anything or guard against
> > > anything.
> >
> > That's true. A comment in the header file wouldn't hurt though.
>
> It looks like that Ian has already pushed the patch. Do I need to send a
> follow-up?
No need for just a comment
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
