Re: [Xen-devel] [TestDay] VMX test report for Xen 4.5.0-rc1

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 12.11.14 at 11:53, <robert.hu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx]
>> >>> On 12.11.14 at 07:58, <robert.hu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > 4. Not all PFs are available if assign multi VT-d devices to Wndows guest 
>> > VM
>> >   http://bugzilla-archived.xenproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1896 
>> 
>> I think we were told the other day that pass-through of PFs is
>> not being supported by Intel. What's the purpose of reporting
>> bugs there?
> This bug was filed before the certainness about PF issue, so this one still 
> follow previous perception. I shall have redefined this bug. Sorry for 
> confusing you. You can ignore this bug itself.
> But there is still another issue incurred if we follow the new perception, 
> i.e. xl tool stack should forbid user to assign PF or if you decide to allow 
> user doing so, some further supporting work shall be done.

Why would the tool stack want to enforce such an Intel(-only?)
policy?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel