[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 2/8] xen: Delay remapping memory of pv-domain

On 14/11/14 04:53, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Using BUG() instead would make the code less complex. Do you really
> think xen_update_mem_tables() would ever fail in a sane system?
> - set_phys_to_machine() would fail only on a memory shortage. Just
>   going on without adding more memory wouldn't lead to a healthy system,
>   I think.
> - The hypervisor calls would fail only in case of parameter errors.
>   This should never happen, so dying seems to be the correct reaction.
> David, what do you think?

BUG() sounds fine.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.