[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for Xen 4.5] xen/arm: Add support for GICv3 for domU
Hi Jan, On 10/31/2014 09:02 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 30.10.14 at 19:51, <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The naming suggests that the #if really should be around just the > gic_version field (with a dummy field in the #else case to be C89 > compatible, e.g. a zero width unnamed bitfield) and the > corresponding #define-s above, ... Not really related to this patch... but the way to improve it (via extending createdomain). I need to create an empty structure. Is the dummy field really needed? If so, did you meant? struct { int :0; } The C spec declare this kind of structure as undefined. Would an empty structure and used it be better? Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |