[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.5 random freeze question
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Stefano Stabellini > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Andrii Tseglytskyi > >> <andrii.tseglytskyi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Stefano Stabellini > >> > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote: > >> >>> Hi Stefano, > >> >>> > >> >>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Stefano Stabellini > >> >>> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >>> > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote: > >> >>> >> Hi Stefano, > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > > if ( !list_empty(¤t->arch.vgic.lr_pending) && > >> >>> >> > > lr_all_full() ) > >> >>> >> > > - GICH[GICH_HCR] |= GICH_HCR_UIE; > >> >>> >> > > + GICH[GICH_HCR] |= GICH_HCR_NPIE; > >> >>> >> > > else > >> >>> >> > > - GICH[GICH_HCR] &= ~GICH_HCR_UIE; > >> >>> >> > > + GICH[GICH_HCR] &= ~GICH_HCR_NPIE; > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > } > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > Yes, exactly > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> I tried, hang still occurs with this change > >> >>> > > >> >>> > We need to figure out why during the hang you still have all the LRs > >> >>> > busy even if you are getting maintenance interrupts that should cause > >> >>> > them to be cleared. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> I see that I have free LRs during maintenance interrupt > >> >>> > >> >>> (XEN) gic.c:871:d0v0 maintenance interrupt > >> >>> (XEN) GICH_LRs (vcpu 0) mask=0 > >> >>> (XEN) HW_LR[0]=9a015856 > >> >>> (XEN) HW_LR[1]=0 > >> >>> (XEN) HW_LR[2]=0 > >> >>> (XEN) HW_LR[3]=0 > >> >>> (XEN) Inflight irq=86 lr=0 > >> >>> (XEN) Inflight irq=2 lr=255 > >> >>> (XEN) Pending irq=2 > >> >>> > >> >>> But I see that after I got hang - maintenance interrupts are generated > >> >>> continuously. Platform continues printing the same log till reboot. > >> >> > >> >> Exactly the same log? As in the one above you just pasted? > >> >> That is very very suspicious. > >> > > >> > Yes exactly the same log. And looks like it means that LRs are flushed > >> > correctly. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> I am thinking that we are not handling GICH_HCR_UIE correctly and > >> >> something we do in Xen, maybe writing to an LR register, might trigger a > >> >> new maintenance interrupt immediately causing an infinite loop. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Yes, this is what I'm thinking about. Taking in account all collected > >> > debug info it looks like once LRs are overloaded with SGIs - > >> > maintenance interrupt occurs. > >> > And then it is not handled properly, and occurs again and again - so > >> > platform hangs inside its handler. > >> > > >> >> Could you please try this patch? It disable GICH_HCR_UIE immediately on > >> >> hypervisor entry. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Now trying. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > >> >> index 4d2a92d..6ae8dc4 100644 > >> >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > >> >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > >> >> @@ -701,6 +701,8 @@ void gic_clear_lrs(struct vcpu *v) > >> >> if ( is_idle_vcpu(v) ) > >> >> return; > >> >> > >> >> + GICH[GICH_HCR] &= ~GICH_HCR_UIE; > >> >> + > >> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags); > >> >> > >> >> while ((i = find_next_bit((const unsigned long *) > >> >> &this_cpu(lr_mask), > >> >> @@ -821,12 +823,8 @@ void gic_inject(void) > >> >> > >> >> gic_restore_pending_irqs(current); > >> >> > >> >> - > >> >> if ( !list_empty(¤t->arch.vgic.lr_pending) && lr_all_full() ) > >> >> GICH[GICH_HCR] |= GICH_HCR_UIE; > >> >> - else > >> >> - GICH[GICH_HCR] &= ~GICH_HCR_UIE; > >> >> - > >> >> } > >> >> > >> >> static void do_sgi(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int othercpu, enum > >> >> gic_sgi sgi) > >> > > >> > >> Heh - I don't see hangs with this patch :) But also I see that > >> maintenance interrupt doesn't occur (and no hang as result) > >> Stefano - is this expected? > > > > No maintenance interrupts at all? That's strange. You should be > > receiving them when LRs are full and you still have interrupts pending > > to be added to them. > > > > You could add another printk here to see if you should be receiving > > them: > > > > if ( !list_empty(¤t->arch.vgic.lr_pending) && lr_all_full() ) > > + { > > + gdprintk(XENLOG_DEBUG, "requesting maintenance interrupt\n"); > > GICH[GICH_HCR] |= GICH_HCR_UIE; > > - else > > - GICH[GICH_HCR] &= ~GICH_HCR_UIE; > > - > > + } > > } > > > > Requested properly: > > (XEN) gic.c:756:d0v0 requesting maintenance interrupt > (XEN) gic.c:756:d0v0 requesting maintenance interrupt > (XEN) gic.c:756:d0v0 requesting maintenance interrupt > (XEN) gic.c:756:d0v0 requesting maintenance interrupt > (XEN) gic.c:756:d0v0 requesting maintenance interrupt > (XEN) gic.c:756:d0v0 requesting maintenance interrupt > (XEN) gic.c:756:d0v0 requesting maintenance interrupt > > But does not occur OK, let's see what's going on then by printing the irq number of the maintenance interrupt: diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c index 4d2a92d..fed3167 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static struct { static DEFINE_PER_CPU(uint64_t, lr_mask); static uint8_t nr_lrs; +static bool uie_on; #define lr_all_full() (this_cpu(lr_mask) == ((1 << nr_lrs) - 1)) /* The GIC mapping of CPU interfaces does not necessarily match the @@ -694,6 +695,7 @@ void gic_clear_lrs(struct vcpu *v) { int i = 0; unsigned long flags; + unsigned long hcr; /* The idle domain has no LRs to be cleared. Since gic_restore_state * doesn't write any LR registers for the idle domain they could be @@ -701,6 +703,13 @@ void gic_clear_lrs(struct vcpu *v) if ( is_idle_vcpu(v) ) return; + hcr = GICH[GICH_HCR]; + if ( hcr & GICH_HCR_UIE ) + { + GICH[GICH_HCR] &= ~GICH_HCR_UIE; + uie_on = 1; + } + spin_lock_irqsave(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags); while ((i = find_next_bit((const unsigned long *) &this_cpu(lr_mask), @@ -865,6 +873,11 @@ void gic_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int is_fiq) intack = GICC[GICC_IAR]; irq = intack & GICC_IA_IRQ; + if ( uie_on ) + { + uie_on = 0; + printk("received maintenance interrupt irq=%d\n", irq); + } if ( likely(irq >= 16 && irq < 1021) ) { local_irq_enable(); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |