Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.5] libxl: remove existence check for PCI device hotplug

["Hu, Robert" <robert.hu@xxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ian Campbell
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:58 PM
> To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> Cc: Ian Jackson; Li, Liang Z; Wei Liu; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.5] libxl: remove existence check for PCI
> device hotplug
> 
> On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 16:28 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:21:23PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 04:01:54PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:10:34PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > > The existence check is to make sure a device is not added to a guest
> > > > > multiple times.
> > > > >
> > > > > PCI device backend path has different rules from vif, disk etc. For
> > > > > example:
> > > > > /local/domain/0/backend/pci/9/0/dev-1/0000:03:10.1
> > > > > /local/domain/0/backend/pci/9/0/key-1/0000:03:10.1
> > > > > /local/domain/0/backend/pci/9/0/dev-2/0000:03:10.2
> > > > > /local/domain/0/backend/pci/9/0/key-2/0000:03:10.2
> > > > >
> > > > > The devid for PCI devices is hardcoded 0. libxl__device_exists only
> > > > > checks up to /local/.../9/0 so it always returns true even the device 
> > > > > is
> > > > > assignable.
> > > > >
> > > > > Remove invocation of libxl__device_exists. We're sure at this point 
> > > > > that
> > > > > the PCI device is assignable (hence no xenstore entry or JSON entry).
> > > > > The check is done before hand. For HVM guest it's done by calling
> > > > > xc_test_assign_device and for PV guest it's done by calling
> > > > > pciback_dev_is_assigned.
> > > > >
> > > > > Reported-by: Li, Liang Z <liang.z.li@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Cc: Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > This patch fixes a regression in 4.5.
> > > >
> > > > Ouch! That needs then to be fixed.
> > > >
> > > > Is the version you would want to commit? I did test it - and it
> > >
> > > Yes.
> >
> > Then Release-Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Applied.
Hi, I'm new here. Shall I ask where does this patch apply to? shall I expect to 
see this issue fixed in Xen 4.5-RC3?
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel