[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] INSTALL: correct EXTRA_CFLAGS handling

To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:27:53 +0100
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:28:11 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Tue, Nov 25, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 05:04:09PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > +Using additional CFLAGS to build tools running in dom0 is required when
> Why the mention of 'buld tools running in dom0'? It sounds like it is
> required to use dom0 to build tools?

Does it really read like dom0 is required?! But I can change it as you
suggest.

Olaf

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] INSTALL: correct EXTRA_CFLAGS handling
  - From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] INSTALL: correct EXTRA_CFLAGS handling
  - From: Olaf Hering
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] INSTALL: correct EXTRA_CFLAGS handling
  - From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.5 RFC] pygrub: Fix regression from c/s d1b93ea, attempt 2
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST v3 04/15] make-flight: Run a basic test on each arm platform
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] INSTALL: correct EXTRA_CFLAGS handling
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] INSTALL: correct EXTRA_CFLAGS handling
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.