|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.5] libxl_set_memory_target: only remove videoram from absolute targets
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Don Slutz wrote:
> On 12/03/14 13:20, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > If the new target is relative to the current target, do not remove
> > videoram again: it has already been removed from the current target.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl.c b/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> > index de23fec..2aa83bd 100644
> > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> > @@ -4741,13 +4741,17 @@ retry_transaction:
> > goto out;
> > }
> > + videoram_s = libxl__xs_read(gc, t, libxl__sprintf(gc,
> > + "%s/memory/videoram", dompath));
> > + videoram = videoram_s ? atoi(videoram_s) : 0;
> > +
> > if (relative) {
> > if (target_memkb < 0 && abs(target_memkb) > current_target_memkb)
> > new_target_memkb = 0;
> > else
> > new_target_memkb = current_target_memkb + target_memkb;
> > } else
> > - new_target_memkb = target_memkb;
> > + new_target_memkb = target_memkb - videoram;
> > if (new_target_memkb > memorykb) {
> > LIBXL__LOG(ctx, LIBXL__LOG_ERROR,
> > "memory_dynamic_max must be less than or equal to"
> > @@ -4763,9 +4767,6 @@ retry_transaction:
> > abort_transaction = 1;
> > goto out;
> > }
> > - videoram_s = libxl__xs_read(gc, t, libxl__sprintf(gc,
> > - "%s/memory/videoram", dompath));
> > - videoram = videoram_s ? atoi(videoram_s) : 0;
> > if (enforce) {
> > memorykb = new_target_memkb;
>
> Since new_target_memkb is now adjusted before this line, you
> need to change this to:
>
> memorykb = new_target_memkb + videoram;
You are right, I'll make the change.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |