Re: [Xen-devel] virtio_net: Fix napi poll list corruption

[Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/20/2014 08:23 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> After d75b1ade567ffab085e8adbbdacf0092d10cd09c (net: less interrupt
>> masking in NAPI) the napi instance is removed from the per-cpu list
>> prior to calling the n->poll(), and is only requeued if all of the
>> budget was used.  This inadvertently broke netfront because netfront
>> does not use NAPI correctly.
> A similar bug exists in virtio_net.
>
> -- >8 --
> The commit d75b1ade567ffab085e8adbbdacf0092d10cd09c (net: less
> interrupt masking in NAPI) breaks virtio_net in an insidious way.
>
> It is now required that if the entire budget is consumed when poll
> returns, the napi poll_list must remain empty.  However, like some
> other drivers virtio_net tries to do a last-ditch check and if
> there is more work it will call napi_schedule and then immediately
> process some of this new work.  Should the entire budget be consumed
> while processing such new work then we will violate the new caller
> contract.
>
> This patch fixes this by not touching any work when we reschedule
> in virtio_net.
>
> The worst part of this bug is that the list corruption causes other
> napi users to be moved off-list.  In my case I was chasing a stall
> in IPsec (IPsec uses netif_rx) and I only belatedly realised that it
> was virtio_net which caused the stall even though the virtio_net
> poll was still functioning perfectly after IPsec stalled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index b8bd719..5ca9771 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -760,7 +760,6 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int 
> budget)
>               container_of(napi, struct receive_queue, napi);
>       unsigned int r, received = 0;
>  
> -again:
>       received += virtnet_receive(rq, budget - received);
>  
>       /* Out of packets? */
> @@ -771,7 +770,6 @@ again:
>                   napi_schedule_prep(napi)) {
>                       virtqueue_disable_cb(rq->vq);
>                       __napi_schedule(napi);
> -                     goto again;
>               }
>       }
>
> Cheers,

Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>

btw, looks like at least caif_virtio has the same issue.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel