|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86/HVM: make hvm_efer_valid() honor guest features
On 12/01/15 08:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Following the earlier similar change validating CR4 modifications.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: consider CR0.PG during restore when checking EFER.LMA
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> @@ -1672,20 +1672,53 @@ static int hvm_save_cpu_ctxt(struct doma
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static bool_t hvm_efer_valid(struct domain *d,
> - uint64_t value, uint64_t efer_validbits)
> +static bool_t hvm_efer_valid(const struct vcpu *v, uint64_t value,
> + signed int cr0_pg)
> {
> - if ( nestedhvm_enabled(d) && cpu_has_svm )
> - efer_validbits |= EFER_SVME;
> + unsigned int ext1_ecx = 0, ext1_edx = 0;
>
> - return !((value & ~efer_validbits) ||
> - ((sizeof(long) != 8) && (value & EFER_LME)) ||
> - (!cpu_has_svm && (value & EFER_SVME)) ||
> - (!cpu_has_nx && (value & EFER_NX)) ||
> - (!cpu_has_syscall && (value & EFER_SCE)) ||
> - (!cpu_has_lmsl && (value & EFER_LMSLE)) ||
> - (!cpu_has_ffxsr && (value & EFER_FFXSE)) ||
> - ((value & (EFER_LME|EFER_LMA)) == EFER_LMA));
> + if ( cr0_pg < 0 && !is_hardware_domain(v->domain) )
> + {
> + unsigned int level;
> +
> + ASSERT(v == current);
> + hvm_cpuid(0x80000000, &level, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> + if ( level >= 0x80000001 )
> + hvm_cpuid(0x80000001, NULL, NULL, &ext1_ecx, &ext1_edx);
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + ext1_edx = boot_cpu_data.x86_capability[X86_FEATURE_LM / 32];
> + ext1_ecx = boot_cpu_data.x86_capability[X86_FEATURE_SVM / 32];
> + }
> +
> + if ( (value & EFER_SCE) &&
> + !(ext1_edx & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_SYSCALL)) )
> + return 0;
> +
> + if ( (value & (EFER_LME | EFER_LMA)) &&
> + !(ext1_edx & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_LM)) )
> + return 0;
> +
> + if ( cr0_pg > 0 && (value & EFER_LMA) && (!(value & EFER_LME) ||
> !cr0_pg) )
> + return 0;
> +
> + if ( (value & EFER_NX) && !(ext1_edx & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_NX)) )
> + return 0;
> +
> + if ( (value & EFER_SVME) &&
> + (!(ext1_ecx & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_SVM)) ||
> + !nestedhvm_enabled(v->domain)) )
> + return 0;
> +
> + if ( (value & EFER_LMSLE) && !cpu_has_lmsl )
> + return 0;
> +
> + if ( (value & EFER_FFXSE) &&
> + !(ext1_edx & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_FFXSR)) )
> + return 0;
> +
> + return 1;
> }
>
> /* These reserved bits in lower 32 remain 0 after any load of CR0 */
> @@ -1763,7 +1796,6 @@ static int hvm_load_cpu_ctxt(struct doma
> struct vcpu *v;
> struct hvm_hw_cpu ctxt;
> struct segment_register seg;
> - uint64_t efer_validbits;
>
> /* Which vcpu is this? */
> vcpuid = hvm_load_instance(h);
> @@ -1794,9 +1826,7 @@ static int hvm_load_cpu_ctxt(struct doma
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - efer_validbits = EFER_FFXSE | EFER_LMSLE | EFER_LME | EFER_LMA
> - | EFER_NX | EFER_SCE;
> - if ( !hvm_efer_valid(d, ctxt.msr_efer, efer_validbits) )
> + if ( !hvm_efer_valid(v, ctxt.msr_efer, MASK_EXTR(ctxt.cr0, X86_CR0_PG)) )
> {
> printk(XENLOG_G_ERR "HVM%d restore: bad EFER %#" PRIx64 "\n",
> d->domain_id, ctxt.msr_efer);
> @@ -2936,12 +2966,10 @@ err:
> int hvm_set_efer(uint64_t value)
> {
> struct vcpu *v = current;
> - uint64_t efer_validbits;
>
> value &= ~EFER_LMA;
>
> - efer_validbits = EFER_FFXSE | EFER_LMSLE | EFER_LME | EFER_NX | EFER_SCE;
> - if ( !hvm_efer_valid(v->domain, value, efer_validbits) )
> + if ( !hvm_efer_valid(v, value, -1) )
> {
> gdprintk(XENLOG_WARNING, "Trying to set reserved bit in "
> "EFER: %#"PRIx64"\n", value);
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |