|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: simplify non-atomic bitops
- being non-atomic, their pointer arguments shouldn't be volatile-
qualified
- their (half fake) memory operands can be a single "+m" instead of
being both an output and an input
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
@@ -53,12 +53,9 @@ static inline void set_bit(int nr, volat
* If it's called on the same region of memory simultaneously, the effect
* may be that only one operation succeeds.
*/
-static inline void __set_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr)
+static inline void __set_bit(int nr, void *addr)
{
- asm volatile (
- "btsl %1,%0"
- : "=m" (ADDR)
- : "Ir" (nr), "m" (ADDR) : "memory");
+ asm volatile ( "btsl %1,%0" : "+m" (ADDR) : "Ir" (nr) : "memory" );
}
#define __set_bit(nr, addr) ({ \
if ( bitop_bad_size(addr) ) __bitop_bad_size(); \
@@ -93,12 +90,9 @@ static inline void clear_bit(int nr, vol
* If it's called on the same region of memory simultaneously, the effect
* may be that only one operation succeeds.
*/
-static inline void __clear_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr)
+static inline void __clear_bit(int nr, void *addr)
{
- asm volatile (
- "btrl %1,%0"
- : "=m" (ADDR)
- : "Ir" (nr), "m" (ADDR) : "memory");
+ asm volatile ( "btrl %1,%0" : "+m" (ADDR) : "Ir" (nr) : "memory" );
}
#define __clear_bit(nr, addr) ({ \
if ( bitop_bad_size(addr) ) __bitop_bad_size(); \
@@ -114,12 +108,9 @@ static inline void __clear_bit(int nr, v
* If it's called on the same region of memory simultaneously, the effect
* may be that only one operation succeeds.
*/
-static inline void __change_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr)
+static inline void __change_bit(int nr, void *addr)
{
- asm volatile (
- "btcl %1,%0"
- : "=m" (ADDR)
- : "Ir" (nr), "m" (ADDR) : "memory");
+ asm volatile ( "btcl %1,%0" : "+m" (ADDR) : "Ir" (nr) : "memory" );
}
#define __change_bit(nr, addr) ({ \
if ( bitop_bad_size(addr) ) __bitop_bad_size(); \
@@ -179,14 +170,13 @@ static inline int test_and_set_bit(int n
* If two examples of this operation race, one can appear to succeed
* but actually fail. You must protect multiple accesses with a lock.
*/
-static inline int __test_and_set_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr)
+static inline int __test_and_set_bit(int nr, void *addr)
{
int oldbit;
asm volatile (
"btsl %2,%1\n\tsbbl %0,%0"
- : "=r" (oldbit), "=m" (ADDR)
- : "Ir" (nr), "m" (ADDR) : "memory");
+ : "=r" (oldbit), "+m" (ADDR) : "Ir" (nr) : "memory" );
return oldbit;
}
#define __test_and_set_bit(nr, addr) ({ \
@@ -226,14 +216,13 @@ static inline int test_and_clear_bit(int
* If two examples of this operation race, one can appear to succeed
* but actually fail. You must protect multiple accesses with a lock.
*/
-static inline int __test_and_clear_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr)
+static inline int __test_and_clear_bit(int nr, void *addr)
{
int oldbit;
asm volatile (
"btrl %2,%1\n\tsbbl %0,%0"
- : "=r" (oldbit), "=m" (ADDR)
- : "Ir" (nr), "m" (ADDR) : "memory");
+ : "=r" (oldbit), "+m" (ADDR) : "Ir" (nr) : "memory" );
return oldbit;
}
#define __test_and_clear_bit(nr, addr) ({ \
@@ -242,14 +231,13 @@ static inline int __test_and_clear_bit(i
})
/* WARNING: non atomic and it can be reordered! */
-static inline int __test_and_change_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr)
+static inline int __test_and_change_bit(int nr, void *addr)
{
int oldbit;
asm volatile (
"btcl %2,%1\n\tsbbl %0,%0"
- : "=r" (oldbit), "=m" (ADDR)
- : "Ir" (nr), "m" (ADDR) : "memory");
+ : "=r" (oldbit), "+m" (ADDR) : "Ir" (nr) : "memory" );
return oldbit;
}
#define __test_and_change_bit(nr, addr) ({ \
Attachment:
x86-non-atomic-bitops.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |