Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] re-order struct domain fields

[Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>]

At 15:42 +0000 on 19 Jan (1421678566), Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... to reduce padding holes.
> 
> I also wonder whether having independent spin locks side by side is
> really a good thing cache-line-bouncing-wise.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

> @@ -390,15 +397,12 @@ struct domain
>  
>      /* If this is not 0, send suspend notification here instead of
>       * raising DOM_EXC */
> -    int              suspend_evtchn;
> +    evtchn_port_t    suspend_evtchn;
>  

This type change looks OK, but please mention it in the cset
description.

Acked-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>

Cheers,

Tim.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel