[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] apic-v reduce network performance in my test case
>>> On 31.01.15 at 11:29, <john.liuqiming@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Recently I met an odd performance problem: when I turn on APIC > Virtualization feature (apicv=1), the network performance of a windows > guest become worse. > > My test case like this: host only have one windows 2008 R2 HVM > guest running,and this guest has a SR-IOV VF network passthrough to it. > Guest using this network access a NAS device. No fontend or backend of > network and storage, all data transfered through network. > > The xentrace data shows: the mainly difference between apicv and > non-apicv, is the way guest write apic registers, and > EXIT_REASON_MSR_WRITE vmexit cost much more time than > EXIT_REASON_APIC_WRITE, but when using WRMSR, the PAUSE vmexit is much > less than using APIC-v. There being heavier use of the pause VMEXIT doesn't by itself say anything, I'm afraid. It may suggest that you have a C-state exit latency problem - try lowering the maximum C-state allowed, or disabling use of C-states altogether. > In commit 7f2e992b824ec62a2818e64390ac2ccfbd74e6b7 > "VMX/Viridian: suppress MSR-based APIC suggestion when having APIC-V", > msr based apic is disabled when apic-v is on, I wonder can they co-exist > in some way? seems for windows guest msr-based apic has better performance. The whole purpose is to avoid the costly MSR access exits. Why would you want to reintroduce that overhead? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |