[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [v2][PATCH] libxl: add one machine property to support IGD GFX passthrough
On 2015/2/2 20:19, Wei Liu wrote: On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:17:23AM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:When we're working to support IGD GFX passthrough with qemu upstream, instead of "-gfx_passthru" we'd like to make that a machine option, "-machine xxx,-igd-passthru=on". This need to bring a change on tool side. Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> --- v2: * Based on some discussions with Wei we'd like to keep both old option, -gfx_passthru, and new machine property option, "-machine xxx,-igd-passthru=on" at the same time but deprecate the old one. Then finally we remove the old one at that point that to give downstream (in this case, Xen) time to cope with the change.My suggestion has one premise -- if upstream QEMU has already released that -gfx_passthru option. If there is no "old one" (in upstream QEMU) at all, then there is nothing to keep and deprecate. Understood. tools/libxl/libxl_dm.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_dm.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_dm.c index c2b0487..8405f0b 100644 --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_dm.c +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_dm.c @@ -701,6 +701,11 @@ static char ** libxl__build_device_model_args_new(libxl__gc *gc,Note this function is upstream QEMU specfic. Yeah. flexarray_append(dm_args, "-net"); flexarray_append(dm_args, "none"); } + /* + * Although we already introduce 'igd-passthru', but we'd like + * to remove this until we give downstream time to cope with + * the change. + */ if (libxl_defbool_val(b_info->u.hvm.gfx_passthru)) { flexarray_append(dm_args, "-gfx_passthru"); }The comment contradicts what I know (or what I think I know). In our last email exchange you said there was no "-gfx_passthru" in any version of upstream QEMU. So, shouldn't you just remove this `if' statement? Right. So what about this? libxl: add one machine property to support IGD GFX passthrough When we're working to support IGD GFX passthrough with qemu upstream, we'd like to introduce a machine option, "-machine xxx,igd-passthru=on", to enable/disable that feature. And we also remove that old option, "-gfx_passthru", just from the case of LIBXL_DEVICE_MODEL_VERSION_QEMU_XEN since actually no any qemu stream version really need or use that. Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_dm.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_dm.c index c2b0487..b888f19 100644 --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_dm.c +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_dm.c@@ -701,9 +701,6 @@ static char ** libxl__build_device_model_args_new(libxl__gc *gc, flexarray_append(dm_args, "-net"); flexarray_append(dm_args, "none"); } - if (libxl_defbool_val(b_info->u.hvm.gfx_passthru)) { - flexarray_append(dm_args, "-gfx_passthru"); - } } else { if (!sdl && !vnc) { flexarray_append(dm_args, "-nographic");@@ -748,6 +745,11 @@ static char ** libxl__build_device_model_args_new(libxl__gc *gc, machinearg, max_ram_below_4g); } } + + if (libxl_defbool_val(b_info->u.hvm.gfx_passthru)) {+ machinearg = libxl__sprintf(gc, "%s,igd-passthru=on", machinearg); + } + flexarray_append(dm_args, machinearg);for (i = 0; b_info->extra_hvm && b_info->extra_hvm[i] != NULL; i++) flexarray_append(dm_args, b_info->extra_hvm[i]); Thanks Tiejun Wei.@@ -748,6 +753,11 @@ static char ** libxl__build_device_model_args_new(libxl__gc *gc, machinearg, max_ram_below_4g); } } + + if (libxl_defbool_val(b_info->u.hvm.gfx_passthru)) { + machinearg = libxl__sprintf(gc, "%s,igd-passthru=on", machinearg); + } + flexarray_append(dm_args, machinearg); for (i = 0; b_info->extra_hvm && b_info->extra_hvm[i] != NULL; i++) flexarray_append(dm_args, b_info->extra_hvm[i]); -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |