[Xen-devel] Formal Vote for changes to Xen Project Security Policy encoded in [PATCH v2 SECURITY-POLICY */9] (vote ends next Wed, Feb 11th)

[Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi all,

the patch series for modifications to 
http://www.xenproject.org/security-policy.html has gone it's second revision 
and is ready for voting. In accordance with our governance, committers are 
eligible to vote. Others can of course voice their opinion.

The complete series can be found in the following mails
* http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03021.html - [PATCH 
v2 SECURITY-POLICY 0/9] Security policy ambiguities - XSA-108 process 
post-mortem
* http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03020.html - [PATCH 
v2 SECURITY-POLICY 1/9] Grammar fix: Remove a comma splice
* http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03018.html - [PATCH 
v2 SECURITY-POLICY 2/9] Add headings
* http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03016.html - [PATCH 
v2 SECURITY-POLICY 3/9] Deployment with Security Team Permission
* http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03022.html - [PATCH 
v2 SECURITY-POLICY 4/9] Use a public mailing list for predisclosure membership 
applications.
* http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03019.html - [PATCH 
v2 SECURITY-POLICY 5/9] Tighten, and make more objective, predisclosure list 
application
* http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03015.html - [PATCH 
v2 SECURITY-POLICY 6/9] Explicitly permit within-list information sharing 
during embargo
* http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03014.html - [PATCH 
v2 SECURITY-POLICY 7/9] Clarify and fix prior consultation text
* http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03017.html - [PATCH 
v2 SECURITY-POLICY 8/9] Clarify what announcements may be made by to service 
users
* http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg03023.html - [PATCH 
v2 SECURITY-POLICY 9/9] Document changes in changelog and heading

As there seems to be no objections, in the discussion leading to this patch 
series, I think we don't need to have a voting form. Replying to this mail with 
+1, 0 -1 "comment" should suffice. Should there be objections and they are 
specific to a specific change above, please refer to the specific change.

I will collate the results on Thursday and make an announcement

All committers are CC'ed

Regards
Lars



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel