[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 12/35] ARM64: Initialization of cpu_logical_map(0)



On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, parth.dixit@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Naresh Bhat <naresh.bhat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Initialization of cpu_logical_map(0) before acpi_boot_init()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Bhat <Naresh.Bhat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
> index 3531d47..569b2da 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
>  #include <xsm/xsm.h>
>  #include <xen/acpi.h>
>  #include <asm/acpi.h>
> +#include <asm-arm/cputype.h>
>  
>  struct bootinfo __initdata bootinfo;
>  
> @@ -749,6 +750,10 @@ void __init start_xen(unsigned long boot_phys_offset,
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_ARM_64)
>      acpi_boot_table_init();
> +
> +    /* Get the boot CPU's MPIDR before cpu logical map is built */
> +    cpu_logical_map(0) = read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
> +
>      acpi_boot_init();
>  #endif

Isn't the current cpu_logical_map initialization in smp_init_cpus()
enough?  If you want to initialize cpu_logical_map earlier, you need to
move the initialization earlier, removing the old one: we cannot have
two places where Xen initialize cpu_logical_map(0).

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.