[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 12/35] ARM64: Initialization of cpu_logical_map(0)
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, parth.dixit@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Naresh Bhat <naresh.bhat@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Initialization of cpu_logical_map(0) before acpi_boot_init() > > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Naresh Bhat <Naresh.Bhat@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c > index 3531d47..569b2da 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ > #include <xsm/xsm.h> > #include <xen/acpi.h> > #include <asm/acpi.h> > +#include <asm-arm/cputype.h> > > struct bootinfo __initdata bootinfo; > > @@ -749,6 +750,10 @@ void __init start_xen(unsigned long boot_phys_offset, > > #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_ARM_64) > acpi_boot_table_init(); > + > + /* Get the boot CPU's MPIDR before cpu logical map is built */ > + cpu_logical_map(0) = read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK; > + > acpi_boot_init(); > #endif Isn't the current cpu_logical_map initialization in smp_init_cpus() enough? If you want to initialize cpu_logical_map earlier, you need to move the initialization earlier, removing the old one: we cannot have two places where Xen initialize cpu_logical_map(0). _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |