Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86/MM: Introduce a p2m class.

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/02/15 18:24, Ed White wrote:
> On 02/06/2015 10:17 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 06/02/15 18:12, Ed White wrote:
>>> On 01/30/2015 02:32 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>> On 30/01/15 00:43, Ed White wrote:
>>>>> Use the class to differentiate between host and nested p2m's, and
>>>>> potentially other classes in the future.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fix p2m class checks that implicitly assume nested and host are
>>>>> the only two classes that will ever exist.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ed White <edmund.h.white@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Acked-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>> Is there anything else I need to do before this is applied?
>>>
>>> Ed
>> It is already committed
>>
>> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commitdiff;h=8fe99c468d977ee077ef064618973e0aca578117
> Thanks. I was expecting it to turn up on xen-changelog, but that's obviously
> not the right way to check.

All patches are committed to staging, and the OSSTest automated test
system periodically fast-forwards master to staging when it deems
staging of sufficient quality.

http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/staging

I do all of my development on top of staging and tend to ignore master. 
master has an annoying habit of lagging.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel