Re: [Xen-devel] dprintk() and gdprintk() to be compiled out when NDEBUG

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 11.02.15 at 11:05, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/02/15 07:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> I'd like to propose to honor the 'd' in these functions' names (which
>> I understand to mean "debug") in that such functions should be
>> no-ops in non-debug builds. I'd then be inclined to introduce a
>> gprintk() automatically adding XENLOG_GUEST and the printing of
>> current using the %pv format. Quite likely the (mis-)use of these
>> two functions may then temporarily result in messages not meant
>> to be debugging ones to become hidden in non-debug builds. If
>> others agree, I'd try to make one pass through the tree to try to
>> identify such, but I'd like to ask others to also keep an eye on that
>> aspect.
> 
> I agree.  I suspect many of the existing gdprintk()s will need to turn
> into dprintk()s.

Maybe, but that's yet another topic (unless you meant gprintk()s
instead of dprintk()s).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel