[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen: arm64: more useful logging on bad trap.
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 10:22 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > >>> + printk("Bad mode in %s handler detected", handler[reason]); > > >>> + printk("ESR=0x%08"PRIx32": EC=%"PRIx32", IL=%"PRIx32", > > >>> ISS=%"PRIx32"\n", > > >>> + hsr.bits, hsr.ec, hsr.len, hsr.iss); > > >> This would be better as a single printk() call, otherwise a different > > >> cpu issuing a printk() could interleave in the middle of the line. > > >> > > >> Also, you appear to have dropped the space between "detected" and "ESR" > > > That's because I forgot to add the \n to the end of the first printk > > > (the intention was to make the log line <80 columns by splitting it into > > > two lines). Having fixed that I think your first comment then becomes > > > irrelevant? Or is there some benefit to printk("foo\nbar\n")? > > > > Not completely irrelevant, but certainly far less problematic, and > > something I wouldn't worry about. > > Thanks, I think I'll just add the \n on commit Which I've now done. thanks all. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |