[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] xen/arm: Do not allocate pte entries for MAP_SMALL_PAGES
On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 13:03 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > > + { > > + pte = mfn_to_xen_entry(mfn, (ai & 0xffff)); > > Please introduce a new macro for the mask. Better would be a pte_foo accessor, similar (if not identical) to x86's pte_get_flags. So pte_get_flags(ai) or so. > > > + pte.pt.table = 1; > > + write_pte(&third[third_table_offset(addr)], pte); > > + } > > break; > > case REMOVE: > > if ( !third[third_table_offset(addr)].pt.valid ) > > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h > > index 3e7b0ae..80415b3 100644 > > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h > > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h > > @@ -61,10 +61,16 @@ > > #define DEV_WC BUFFERABLE > > #define DEV_CACHED WRITEBACK > > > > +/* bit 16 in the Attribute index can be used to know if > > + * PTE entry should be added or not. This is useful > > + * when ONLY non-leaf page table entries need to allocated > > + */ > > +#define PTE_INVALID (0x1 << 16) > > It makes more sense to introduce a PTE_PRESENT flags compare to > PTE_INVALID. The former has more meaning that the latter. Agreed that PTE_PRESENT is the way to go. Ideally this could all be done via the lpae_pt_t type, but I suspect that might turn out to be tricky. #define PTE_PRESENT ((struct lpae_t){ .pt.present = 1 }).bits probably doesn't work, I'm not even sure if this sort of thing is possible. If not then "#define PTE_PRESET (1ULL<<0)". _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |