[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 6/7] build system: stubdom targets now depends on mini-os target
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 05:12:20PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 05:01:26PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 16:52 +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 04:33:17PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 11:17 +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > > @@ -161,7 +163,7 @@ clean-tools: > > > > > $(MAKE) -C tools clean > > > > > > > > > > .PHONY: clean-stubdom > > > > > -clean-stubdom: > > > > > +clean-stubdom: mini-os-dir > > > > > $(MAKE) -C stubdom crossclean > > > > > ifeq (x86_64,$(XEN_TARGET_ARCH)) > > > > > XEN_TARGET_ARCH=x86_32 $(MAKE) -C stubdom crossclean > > > > > @@ -187,11 +189,12 @@ distclean-tools: > > > > > $(MAKE) -C tools distclean > > > > > > > > > > .PHONY: distclean-stubdom > > > > > -distclean-stubdom: > > > > > +distclean-stubdom: mini-os-dir > > > > > > > > These two are a bit odd, since they will force a clone in order to clean > > > > (and in the distclean case immediately discard again). > > > > > > > > > > That's because stubdom's distclean is quite broken, it just won't work > > > without mini-os. > > > > If the mini-os dir is not present then I don't think there is any need > > to distclean the stubdom, is there? How would anything be present? > > > > If user builds stubdom then deletes mini-os then wants to clean > studom. > > If we don't have that dependence, we just print > > Please run `make mini-os-dir' in top-level directory > > due to a check in stubdom's Makefile. I think this is acceptable too. > > > > > > > > The way we handle this with e.g. qemu is to have > > > > subdir-clean-qemu-xen-traditional-dir: > > > > set -e; if test -d qemu-xen-traditional-dir/.; then \ > > > > $(MAKE) -C qemu-xen-traditional-dir clean; \ > > > > fi > > > > > > > > so I think you want a pair of {clean,distclean}-mini-os-dir rules which > > > > recurse iff the dir exists. > > > > > > > > > > No, we don't actually need to enter mini-os dir and make clean / > > > distclean when doing clean and distclean of stubdom. > > > > Didn't you just contradict what you said further above? > > > > I was thinking all those objects are not placed inside min-os's dir so > there is nothing to clean inside mini-os's directory > > However, stubdom does have > $(MAKE) DESTDIR= -C $(MINI_OS) clean > > So there is no need for a separate subdir-clean-mini-os-dir. > > We can also delete that line. But I would avoid touching stubdom's > Makefile if not necessary. > OK, it turns out if I just remove that line in stubdom's clean target everything works fine. With that change I can remove stubdom's clean and distclean dependency on mini-os dir. Wei. > Wei. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |