[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 6/8] xen: x86: make XEN_PV* stuff depend on PARAVIRT and PARAVIRT_CLOCK
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx> > > This will later more easily let us unfold PARAVIRT and PARAVIRT_CLOCK > from under CONFIG_XEN. All the XEN_PV* stuff is under the x86 universe. > This is as per the agreed upon Xen Kconfig changes [0]. > > [0] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/231579 > > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/xen/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig b/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig > index 9e0442f..50e2fb4 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ config XEN_DOM0 > > config XEN_PVHVM > def_bool y > + select PARAVIRT > + select PARAVIRT_CLOCK > depends on XEN && PCI && X86_LOCAL_APIC > > config XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY > @@ -49,11 +51,15 @@ config XEN_DEBUG_FS > config XEN_PVH > bool "Support for running as a PVH guest" > depends on X86_64 && XEN > + select PARAVIRT > + select PARAVIRT_CLOCK > select XEN_PVHVM > def_bool n > > config XEN_PV > bool "Support for running as a PV guest" > depends on XEN && X86 > + select PARAVIRT > + select PARAVIRT_CLOCK > select XEN_HAVE_PVMMU > def_bool n Given that all select PARAVIRT and PARAVIRT_CLOCK, shouldn't we just move them under config XEN? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |