Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] correct mis-conversion set_bit() -> __cpumask_set_cpu() by 4aaca0e9cd

[Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Monday, February 23, 2015, 12:06:00 PM, you wrote:

> I have no idea how I came to use __cpumask_set_cpu() there, the
> conversion should have been set_bit() -> __set_bit(). The wrong
> construct results in problems on systems with relatively few CPUs.

> Reported-by: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

> --- a/xen/common/softirq.c
> +++ b/xen/common/softirq.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ void cpu_raise_softirq(unsigned int cpu,
>      if ( !per_cpu(batching, this_cpu) || in_irq() )
>          smp_send_event_check_cpu(cpu);
>      else
> -        __cpumask_set_cpu(nr, &per_cpu(batch_mask, this_cpu));
> +        __set_bit(nr, &per_cpu(batch_mask, this_cpu));
>  }
>  
>  void cpu_raise_softirq_batch_begin(void)

Hi Jan,

Any reason this wasn't applied to staging yet ?

--
Sander



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel