[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Roy Franz <roy.franz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Stefano Stabellini > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Daniel Kiper wrote: >>> We need more fine grained knowledge about EFI environment and check >>> for EFI platform and EFI loader separately to properly support >>> multiboot2 protocol. In general Xen loaded by this protocol uses >>> memory mappings and loaded modules in simliar way to Xen loaded >>> by multiboot (v1) protocol. Hence, split efi_enabled to efi_platform >>> and efi_loader. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c | 4 ++-- >>> xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c | 2 +- >>> xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c | 5 +++-- >>> xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c | 4 ++-- >>> xen/arch/x86/setup.c | 8 ++++---- >>> xen/arch/x86/time.c | 2 +- >>> xen/common/efi/boot.c | 5 +++++ >>> xen/common/efi/runtime.c | 5 +++-- >>> xen/drivers/acpi/osl.c | 2 +- >>> xen/include/xen/efi.h | 6 +++++- >>> 10 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c b/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c >>> index 500133a..63b976c 100644 >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c >>> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ int __init dmi_get_table(u32 *base, u32 *len) >>> struct dmi_eps eps; >>> char __iomem *p, *q; >>> >>> - if (efi_enabled) { >>> + if (efi_platform) { >>> if (!efi_dmi_size) >>> return -1; >>> *base = efi_dmi_address; >>> @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ static void __init dmi_decode(struct dmi_header *dm) >>> >>> void __init dmi_scan_machine(void) >>> { >>> - if ((!efi_enabled ? dmi_iterate(dmi_decode) : >>> + if ((!efi_platform ? dmi_iterate(dmi_decode) : >>> dmi_efi_iterate(dmi_decode)) == 0) >>> dmi_check_system(dmi_blacklist); >>> else >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c b/xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c >>> index 158a164..5d4564c 100644 >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c >>> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static inline struct vcpu *mapcache_current_vcpu(void) >>> sync_local_execstate(); >>> /* We must now be running on the idle page table. */ >>> ASSERT((cr3 = read_cr3()) == __pa(idle_pg_table) || >>> - (efi_enabled && cr3 == efi_rs_page_table())); >>> + (efi_platform && cr3 == efi_rs_page_table())); >>> } >>> >>> return v; >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c b/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c >>> index b8f49f8..5060e6f 100644 >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/stub.c >>> @@ -3,8 +3,9 @@ >>> #include <xen/init.h> >>> #include <xen/lib.h> >>> >>> -#ifndef efi_enabled >>> -const bool_t efi_enabled = 0; >>> +#ifndef efi_platform >>> +bool_t efi_platform = 0; >>> +bool_t efi_loader = 0; >>> #endif >>> >>> void __init efi_init_memory(void) { } >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c b/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c >>> index a38e016..c4e3041 100644 >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mpparse.c >>> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static inline void __init >>> construct_default_ISA_mptable(int mpc_default_type) >>> >>> static __init void efi_unmap_mpf(void) >>> { >>> - if (efi_enabled) >>> + if (efi_platform) >>> __set_fixmap(FIX_EFI_MPF, 0, 0); >>> } >>> >>> @@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ void __init find_smp_config (void) >>> { >>> unsigned int address; >>> >>> - if (efi_enabled) { >>> + if (efi_platform) { >>> efi_check_config(); >>> return; >>> } >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c >>> index c27c49c..711fdb0 100644 >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c >>> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void __init parse_video_info(void) >>> struct boot_video_info *bvi = &bootsym(boot_vid_info); >>> >>> /* The EFI loader fills vga_console_info directly. */ >>> - if ( efi_enabled ) >>> + if ( efi_platform ) >>> return; >>> >>> if ( (bvi->orig_video_isVGA == 1) && (bvi->orig_video_mode == 3) ) >>> @@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p) >>> if ( ((unsigned long)cpu0_stack & (STACK_SIZE-1)) != 0 ) >>> panic("Misaligned CPU0 stack."); >>> >>> - if ( efi_enabled ) >>> + if ( efi_loader ) >>> { >>> set_pdx_range(xen_phys_start >> PAGE_SHIFT, >>> (xen_phys_start + BOOTSTRAP_MAP_BASE) >> PAGE_SHIFT); >>> @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p) >>> * we can relocate the dom0 kernel and other multiboot modules. Also, >>> on >>> * x86/64, we relocate Xen to higher memory. >>> */ >>> - for ( i = 0; !efi_enabled && i < mbi->mods_count; i++ ) >>> + for ( i = 0; !efi_loader && i < mbi->mods_count; i++ ) >>> { >>> if ( mod[i].mod_start & (PAGE_SIZE - 1) ) >>> panic("Bootloader didn't honor module alignment request."); >>> @@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p) >>> >>> if ( !xen_phys_start ) >>> panic("Not enough memory to relocate Xen."); >>> - reserve_e820_ram(&boot_e820, efi_enabled ? mbi->mem_upper : >>> __pa(&_start), >>> + reserve_e820_ram(&boot_e820, efi_loader ? mbi->mem_upper : >>> __pa(&_start), >>> __pa(&_end)); >>> >>> /* Late kexec reservation (dynamic start address). */ >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/time.c b/xen/arch/x86/time.c >>> index 74c01e3..cdd17cb 100644 >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c >>> @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static unsigned long get_cmos_time(void) >>> static bool_t __read_mostly cmos_rtc_probe; >>> boolean_param("cmos-rtc-probe", cmos_rtc_probe); >>> >>> - if ( efi_enabled ) >>> + if ( efi_platform ) >>> { >>> res = efi_get_time(); >>> if ( res ) >>> diff --git a/xen/common/efi/boot.c b/xen/common/efi/boot.c >>> index ac6881e..8aafcfd 100644 >>> --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c >>> +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c >>> @@ -708,6 +708,11 @@ efi_start(EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle, EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE >>> *SystemTable) >>> char *option_str; >>> bool_t use_cfg_file; >>> >>> +#ifndef CONFIG_ARM /* TODO - disabled until implemented on ARM */ >>> + efi_platform = 1; >>> + efi_loader = 1; >>> +#endif >> >> What exactly needs to be implemented on ARM? I thought that EFI ARM >> support for Xen is pretty much complete. >> > EFI runtime services support has not been implemented for ARM. > I'll have to look to see how efi_platform and efi_loader relate to > that, I don't know off hand. > Reviewing the #ifndef CONFIG_ARM in EFI code, and the efi_enabled usage elsewhere, the remaining EFI tasks on ARM look like: * Support for SetVirtualAddressMap * Runtime service support - looks like just time function used by x86 in get_cmos_time() Not strictly EFI, but related: * Lookup of ACPI tables * Lookup of SMBIOS tables Roy _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |