Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] Add flag to start info regarding virtual mapped p2m list

[Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>]

On 03/03/2015 11:52 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 03.03.15 at 11:32, <JGross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 03/03/2015 11:27 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > Also I'm not particularly happy with the name, as it suggests to be
> > > a statement about the initial P2M the guest gets handed - yet that
> > > is always virtually mapped. SIF_PERMANENT_VIRT_P2M is getting a
> > > little long I'm afraid, so I'm looking for better suggestions.
> > SIF_VIRT_KERNEL_P2M?
> > SIF_FLAT_P2M?
> Neither reflects that this is not a statement about the initial P2M.
What about SIF_VIRT_P2M_4TOOLS?

At least this variant would give a hint regarding the consumer of the
p2m. Anybody wanting to know more should probably read the comment. :-)


Juergen


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel