[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86/xen/apic: Work with UP, non-SMP 32-bit kernels.
On 03/03/15 20:29, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:20:41PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> Most of the APIC code that use APIC_LDR is not used on >> 64-bit. On 32-bit it is bit of an hack - and the mechanism >> it is uses is to "setup" the APIC_LDR via apci->init_apic_ldr >> (which we set to NULL) and then use apic->x86_32_early_logical_apicid >> to get an CPU to APIC ID mapping and also apic->read to match >> the APIC_LDR. >> >> The 'x86_32_early_logical_apicid' is called from 'setup_local_APIC' >> which is called from the following functions: >> - start_secondary ->smp_callin -> apic_ap_setup [not called on PV] >> - native_smp_prepare_cpus -> apci_bsp_setup [not called on PV] >> - up_late_init -> APIC_init_uniprocessor -> apic_bsp_setup >> ->setup_local_APIC >> [called on PV with CONFIG_SMP not defined, CONFIG_X86_32 and UP kernel] >> >> This patch fixes the build issue and also allows the bootup >> to continue without warnings. >> >> Reported-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/x86/xen/apic.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/apic.c b/arch/x86/xen/apic.c >> index 86bea3e..de1c74d 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/xen/apic.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/apic.c >> @@ -56,7 +56,10 @@ static u32 xen_apic_read(u32 reg) >> >> if (reg == APIC_LVR) >> return 0x10; >> - >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 >> + if (reg == APIC_LDR) >> + return SET_APIC_LOGICAL_ID(1UL << smp_processor_id()); >> +#endif >> if (reg != APIC_ID) >> return 0; >> >> @@ -117,6 +120,12 @@ static int xen_phys_pkg_id(int initial_apic_id, int >> index_msb) >> return initial_apic_id >> index_msb; >> } >> >> +static int xen_x86_32_early_logical_apicid(int cpu) >> +{ >> + /* Match with APIC_LDR read. Otherwise setup_local_APIC complains. */ >> + return 1 << cpu; >> +} >> + > > Argh. That should have been wrapped with CONFIG_X86_32 otherwise it will > complain > on 64-bit (not used.. etc). > > David, I can commit it in and fix it up. Can you fold all fixes these into the original patch? No need to unnecessary break bisection. David _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |