[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] "./configure: line 7058: python-config: command not found" after commit 0013245
On 04/03/15 12:35, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 12:27 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi Ian, >> >> On 04/03/15 09:07, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 19:41 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >>>> python-dev is not installed. Although I have libpython-dev installed. >>> >>> And this used to work I suppose? >>> >>> As I said in <1425404173.25940.82.camel@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> m4/python_devel.m4 seems to suggest it was made optional on >>> purpose, I don't know why or which versions of Python were the >>> first to include the tool though. >>> >>> So it appears to be deliberate that the Python checks do not require >>> python-config. But the new Python vs. Fortify checks _do_ require it. >>> >>> So the question is: why was it optional in the first place? Then we >>> should know if we can make it a requirement or if we need to fix the >>> Fortify check. >>> >>> Aha, adding --follow to my earlier git log m4/python_devel.m4 leads me >>> to: >>> >>> commit 474a0e59d821bfb49b64c3d722a000bd9b5b7599 >>> Author: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Date: Tue Apr 3 14:28:45 2012 +0100 >>> >>> autoconf: fix python-dev detection on old python versions >>> >>> Replaced the use of python-config (that is only present in Python >= >>> 2.5.x) >>> with the distutils python module. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Zhang, Yang Z <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Tested-by: KUWAMURA Shin'ya <kuwa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Committed-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> So it seems like it is necessary to continue to work without >>> python-config present. >>> >>> In my same earlier mail I said: >>>> Perhaps AX_CHECK_PYTHON_FORTIFY_NOOPT should be a nop unless >>>> python-config is available? >>>> >>>> Or perhaps AX_CHECK_PYTHON_DEVEL should export PYTHON_CFLAGS etc which >>>> the fortify test should look at instead of invoking python-cofnig? >>> >>> I think it would be acceptable in the first instance to simply only run >>> the Fortify check if python-config is present and hope that older >>> distros didn't have the incompatibility. If we then find such an older >>> distro then we can look at switching to something more complex. >> >> On some distributions we may have the headers installed but not >> python-config (It's the case on my debian Jessie). > > If python-config is available on that distro then this IMHO is a build > environment bug, i.e. if python-config is part of the Python version you > are using then you should make it available. python-config is part of python-dev package. Although I have only install libpython-dev (which contains the headers). > python-config is (according to the commit log above) optional so that > people using Python <= 2.4 can still build Xen. Would it make sense to require python-config for (python >= 2.4)? Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |