[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 1/2]xen boot_cpu_data initialize
Thank you :-) Sure I have no problem, you can add second patch of this series. I will work on the comments and will again resend the patch. Thank you. Regards, Uma Sharma On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Uma, > > First of all, nice to see the patch here on xen-devel... good job! ;-P > > A few things: > > On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 12:48 +0530, Uma Sharma wrote: >> This patch inserts some boot data initilization in xen/arch and >> function definition in xen/include. >> > About this description. The fact that it adds a function in a file, is > pretty evident from the code, so it's not really important to say it > here. > > OTOH, what you could do here in the changelog, is explaining why the > change introduced is good/necessary. > > In the case of this patch, you can see here: > > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-08/msg02166.html > > how I tried to do right that (sorry for 'citing' myself, but it's too > easy an example in this case! :-P) > > Also, when one needs to send more than one patch (we call it a "patch > series"), what we usually do is to provide some sort of 'patch 0 > message', also known as 'cover letter', in which you introduce the > various patches, explaining what they do, why you've done the work, and > other things... For example, in your case, that would be the perfect > place where to put a summary of the experiments you performed and of > they're results, so people can see what the patches are useful for > (performance improvement, in this case). > > Also from my old series, here's the cover letter: > > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-08/msg02168.html > > And you'll fine a lot of other examples on the mailing list. :-) > > About Cc-ing people: you did good Cc-ing George, which is the maintainer > of the scheduler, and me, which am also active in that area, and am > familiar with your work. However, this patches touches arch/x86, so you > should Cc the maintainers of the x86 architecture too (you can easily > figure that out from the MAINTAINERS file). > > Last but not least, threading: the cover letter should start a new > thread, and all the patches should be replies to it. I don't know what > you use to generate and send te patches, but whatever tool it is, there > usually are many ways to achieve the above. > > Regards, > Dario -- Regards, Uma Sharma http://about.me/umasharma _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |