[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: gic: GICv2 & GICv3 only supports 1020 physical interrupts
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 14:00 +0200, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Ian, > > On 05/03/2015 19:00, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 16:35 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > >> + gicv3_info.nr_lines = min((unsigned)1020, nr_lines); > > > > "1020U" is the correct way to write (unsigned)1020 I think (in both > > places). > > I gave a look on several usage of min in arch/arm and (unsigned) was used. I don't see any with a literal number, which is the main point. (unsigned)PAGE_SIZE is fine, because you can't write PAGE_SIZEU very easily. (Leaving aside whether PAGE_SIZE should be unsigned in its definition. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |